The Enemy Who Surpasses The Law
The Enemy Who Surpasses The Law
- Introduction - - The
rulers' crimes - -
Banalities you can get punished for
- - The point of
the law - - The folly of
elections - - How to
bury a politician: Călin Georgescu's example
- - How to bury a
politician(s), revisited
- - The legislative
mirage - - There is no
democracy - -
European Slavery Union wants to take over all media
- - COVID slavery
exposes the legal beast -
Introduction
These "crimes" you all speak so seriously of... To me, this has all been nothing
more than a game.
The rulers' crimes
useless causes such as the War on Terror (archive)
Government policies such as the Philippine drug
war (archive)
(MozArchive) are killing
thousands including innocents.
killing millions worldwide. For a specific example, the billionaires behind
It killed hundreds of thousands of people, left many more grieving, yet its
creators face no consequences (archive)
Cigarette producers and marketers have killed 100 million people in the 20th
century (archive)
The junk food industry has spent billions to make millions of people
addicted
to their shit food which has created most chronic
diseases,
claiming much of the lives attributed to them.
CEOs are purposefully (archive)
(MozArchive) creating
the terrible workplace conditions that are causing depression and driving
people to
suicide, or
People such as the president of Brazil (archive)
(MozArchive) are
ordering the cutting of rainforests which is robbing indigenous populations
of their
homes,
and the victims are being killed if they resist the eviction.
(MozArchive) and injur
ed
SWAT teams are kidnapping unvaccinated children (archive)
(MozArchive) from their
homes.
Doctors in the United States partially cut off the genitals of defenseless
infant boys for profit
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20240225025643/https://intactamerica.or
g/economics-of-circumcision/] and face no consequences for it. Infants often
(MozArchive) or
(MozArchive), yet
(MozArchive) and
(MozArchive) keep
pretending that cutting off the foreskin is healthy.
The US government has blown
up the World Trade
Center on September 11, 2001, killing almost three thousand people (archive)
(MozArchive) directly,
On March 11, 2020, the WHO declared a worldwide COVID "pandemic". In a package
deal with it we've received unprecedented slavery, mind control and
psychological torture consisting of constantly repeated media
scaremongering, baseless
and dehumanizing lockdowns, mask mandates, and
distancing,
censorship of
alternative narratives including actual treatments for
infections, vaccine
extermination and in the
end gaslighting to
prevent any consequences for the perpetrators of this worldwide crime against
humanity. The vast majority of world's governments bought the scam, and the
few who attempted significant enough resistance, had their presidents
assassinated or coerced in
In the vast majority of countries, it is accepted to send your kids to the
torture chamber known as
school for the entirety of
their youth. Though some places lack compulsory
schooling (archive)
, if you look at what those are, it's obvious it's not
because of the benevolence of their governments (and even there, more people
finish it than not). As far as I can see, school has exclusively negative
effects on students,
parents and
teachers. It turns
kids into slaves in
various ways and
perpetuates the jungle
mindset. There is no
good justification for
keeping it around, yet no politician will touch it because they love what it
turns humans into.
The obvious question is: are the vermin commiting these crimes going to suffer
any consequences? And the answer is a resounding NO - in fact, in our
current society, the rulers and their minions have free reign to kill, hurt
and destroy. And they don't even try to hide it - it's out in the open; I've
found all the above information on public search engines. So the high-up mass
murderers get off scot-free; what about regular people?
Banalities you can get punished for
(MozArchive) - He said:
"it is a persistent disobedience of court orders but I will be sending a man
to prison for asking for food when he was hungry. It is a difficult situation
and there is no satisfactory answer." (Oh, there is - just leave him
alone!)
Okay, enough of these. Painting graffiti, feeding pigeons, begging or selling
handmade stuff will net you a bigger punishment than even mass murder at the
hands of the rulers (who will not suffer any consequences at all). They are an
enemy who surpasses the law - since they make it, they have of course
included a clause for themselves and their minions to be immune to it. All the
stuff for which you would be punished, they do with impunity. Take the Kazakh
(MozArchive) everywhere
(MozArchive), TV...Of
course, they also let big corpos do the same. The world is their territory, their
playground - they are the judge, jury and executioner. It is up to them to
decide what "crime" means - if they decide cutting down
trees is
justified, then that's that (but only if they do
so (archiv
e)
The point of the law
The above examples should have made clear that the law exists for the purpose of
keeping the current power structure where the really high ups can do
everything, while the plebs at the very bottom exist only to be enslaved and
abused. It even includes something called disorderly
conduct (archive)
(MozArchive), which can
fit absolutely everything and is obviously designed to provide a way to punish
anyone the rulers want to get rid of. The structure is like a pyramid with only
three levels: the bottom one that's extremely wide and fits almost everyone, the
middle one that's very narrow and contains only the protected groups that keep
the plebs on leashes, and the top one that's one block-wide and is dedicated to
the very few rulers that decide everything (this is simplified, but works for
easy understanding). A good analogy would be the Nazi concentration camps that
had the Nazis as ultimate rulers, then the Kapos (who - remember - were still
prisoners themselves, just with some privileges like avoiding abuse and
receiving better food, etc) that were assigned the task of keeping the other
prisoners under control, and finally the vast majority of regular prisoners that
were on the level of cockroaches. The prisoners particularly abusive and power
hungry were chosen for the Kapo positions. Does that remind you of something in
the current world?
Police are the modern Kapos, ordered to bully the plebs and remind them of
their position in hierarchy every so often, so that the rebel's spirit is
contained. They suffer no
punishment (archive)
(MozArchive) even if they
From the first article: Police fatally shoot an average of around 1000 people
each year, and the criminal justice system holds that almost every single
shooting is legal. Why are the rulers allowing them to avoid consequences?
Because they are performing a useful and essential function of keeping the
the process of creating a scared and obedient population has to begin when
they're young and defenseless:
In December of 2015, Tucker, a 13-year-old Black student in Washington
state, was arrested as a result of an incident that started when he mumbled
a curse word to himself. Tucker’s teacher ordered him to go sit outside on a
bench; when Tucker refused to go outside unprotected in the cold, his
teacher called the school police officer. The officer grabbed Tucker,
slammed him to the ground, and as Tucker flailed, put his knee of the back
of Tucker’s head. Tucker was then arrested and booked into juvenile
detention. He was charged with the crimes of ‘disturbing school’ and
‘disrupting a law enforcement officer.‘
And the abusers are unaccountable as usual:
Even fewer schools require any kind of data collection of officer
activities. And overwhelmingly, students, parents and teachers have little
oversight of, and no recourse for conflicts with, school police officers.
This job is so important that a police officer cannot ever feel inhibitions
while doing it - thus their immunity to punishment. Disruption, disorder,
resistance is something the system absolutely hates and it must be swiftly
and fully dealt with. Another way this happens is when social workers (another
set of Kapos) take away the children of people raising them "wrong" (a
kidnapping if done by anyone else), which can include the child not being
heavy enough, despite being healthy otherwise (archive)
(MozArchive), or
(MozArchive). They are
(MozArchive), as you
might have guessed:
However, there is one thing that remains rare in CPS cases - that is, for
anyone within the system to be held accountable. Repercussions for social
workers, the CPS agency, or doctors involved in taking children from
innocent parents are very rare.
Ukrainian war grabbers are another set of Kapos, hunting down people who don't
want to be sacrificed inside some ditch for the delusions of psycho Zelensky.
(MozArchive) is a
mainstream source admitting that the grabbing happens:
In one video three officers in military fatigues push a man in a tracksuit
into a van. A policeman walks away and hides in his unmarked car, as if
wanting nothing to do with the forcible recruitment. Then women are seen
attacking the officers and opening the van’s door, allowing another man to
escape.
In another episode, recruiters have grabbed a man in the street, as an angry
crowd stands by. A female voice shouts: “fuck off! You are worse than the
Russians.” Another example - filmed form a bus - shows a man in black,
intended for recruitment - push the officer to the ground, then run away.
At least people resisted, but it's not enough. The Kapos have not incured any
permanent damage and will surely come back for another victim where the bad
ending might finally happen (dying in the aforementioned ditch). The problem is
the current societal structure of "lawmakers" deciding what will be done to
"citizens", and then sending their pawns to execute. The long drawn out process
of writing down the laws and voting on them (you are not invited to the
vote) only gives it a
pretense of legitimacy in the minds of people, but doesn't actually make a
difference - you're still being grabbed. And it's the pretense of legitimacy,
the pretense that the blame lies on the "citizens", that makes the law a
particularly sneaky - and important to deal with - enemy.
The folly of elections
Yet people still trust the law-based system. So much so that - if you mention a
societal problem to them - they will often reply with a variant of "it's because
of the politicians we've voted in!" as if they were hypnotized. Some
examples (archive)
It's both. The reason the policy makers do this is because of the size of
the female voting block, and because, unlike men, women vote their
interests.
Until the corrupt left government will be finally taken over. You will
always have tax payer wasted games like Dustbin.
You need to vote for better politicians, who actually care about the people
and not about ideology
It's because far too many of us believe, dream and/or think that 1 day we
will be the boss, the owner, the big man in control so they keep voting
for politicians who don't care about workers in the hopes that 1 day when
they are in charge it will be easier for them to stay in control.
I'm definitely voting for the "far-right" euroskeptic party in next year's
elections
Yeah, he's a super Eurocrat globalist. I was APPALLED that Poles brought him
back after his previous anti-Polish (and pro-EU) nonsense. I really
wouldn't bet on Poles not electing another EU Trojan horse next year
Hey, this is what everyone voted for, remember?! [...]
Not to mention the uncountable amount of YouTube videos analyzing voting
results, Twitter / "X" screeching, etc. Everyone acts as if elections were the
most important events in history - on the level of a meteor strike or an alien
invasion. And it's not just random internet travelers that believe this, but big
organizations like the
EFF (archiv
e)
(MozArchive) where they
say Courts and legislatures must keep pace to ensure that privacy rights do not
fall victim to the advancement of technology. The point here is, that every
community (whether it's men's rights, gaming, conspiracy, privacy...) out there
believes that the legal system will somehow turn out to be their savior. To
materialize this hope, they try to vote in a certain way, hoping that their
favored politician or ruling party gets in. The people's trust is based on the
idea that how they vote matters; that the politicians - in the end - have to
appease their voters through their policies. What prevents the legal circus
show from being recognized as simply a pack of psychopaths codifying ways of
abusing and enslaving us, is the belief that we are able to significantly affect
the process.
This is the great trap that the rulers have set up: first, create the political
system that enslaves people, and then convince them that the only way to change
the situation is through that system itself (directing attention away from
the real solutions). Let's set the record straight: what can you even affect by
voting? Only which president or political party rules over you. Of course there
are usually only two or three realistic choices, because if you vote for some
obscure person, she has no chance of getting in anyway. The big parties have
much more funds to spend on their campaigns, etc. There are also
indications that election results are
manipulated; so even if your favorite actually received the most votes, it's not
a guarantee of getting in.
More importantly, as the voting period ends, so does your decision-making
power. Now, the rulers can approve or deny whatever laws they imagine, and you
can only sit back and watch. All promises that candidates have made go out
the window, simply because there is zero consequence for violating them. You
might say that they won't receive the votes during the next elections if they
fuck up really badly, but that still means 4 years of dealing with their
bullshit, which also accumulates (as old laws don't just go away when the rulers
change). And again, there are few choices, so often (always?) you can only pick
whichever you think is the least shitty. It's like injecting the inactivated
virus vaccines over the mRNAs - much better, but still hurting yourself. Because
of all this, politicians just don't have to care about the plebeians that much,
if at all.
More than that - if you live, for example, in an European Union country, your
own nation has to answer to them anyway, lest it get
fined (archive)
(MozArchive). So the
existence of even the national government becomes illusory; not that that would
make us more free - you'd still have no way to affect specific government
decisions (except to wait for the next elections and blindly hope your new
ruler will finally do something about the things you care about - which barely
ever happens, and literally never for things that could actually threaten the
power structure). And, even assuming an independent national government, the
area over which it rules is just way too big. For example, one town might like
mask mandates, and the other might not; but both will have to deal with them if
the rulers so desire. Clearly we can see, that even with the best assumptions,
the voting system is completely hopeless for providing real change.
What about the so-called good politicians? Simply put - it's another illusion.
Either they are not actually good or they don't get into positions of power.
Every so often an alleged political hero appears whom people then begin to
worship. NaturalNews, one of my favorite news sites, still believes that Trump
will make America great again, and runs stories defending him all the time.
That's despite the fact that he lied about many important
issues
(MozArchive). UPDATE
2022: hey, maybe we should remind ourselves who was responsible (archive)
(MozArchive) for the
creation and popularization of the poison known as the COVID
vaccine. Do you still
believe in your political heroes? Has anyone out there shown even a drop of
humanity during the "pandemic"? No - maybe except a few African
presidents, that in 3 out of
4 cases paid for their insubordination dearly. All the other politicians buried
their people with
restrictions and
up their asses (well, arms). And I'm not just talking about the presidents of
Europe, Asia, etc. But also the health ministers and the lesser politicians who
just went along with the narrative (and some even tried to push for forced
vaccines).
Sure, there were also a few politicians who were against the narrative; however,
they never got into power and the restrictions still got pushed through. All
the people who were theoretically supposed to make the best decisions for us
(the presidents, health ministers, etc) - totally failed. I mean, not a single
relevant person even mentioned vitamin D in the treatment of
COVID. Where were the vitamin
D dispenser sites? How is it possible that everyone in politics is so retarded
as to not have realized the utility of vitamin D (and other treatments)? And
that no one has realized the danger of the vaccines, even when people were
course, it's not retardation that did it - but the fact that they were all
following orders.
I originally wrote this report before COVID. But - if there is anything that
proves the theory about the NWO / shadow government - it is the fake pandemic. I
mean, every major politician has swallowed the narrative; this is clearly
impossible organically. We even have proof from the
highest positions at the WHO, where the ivermectin treatment was buried. Not
that I think ivermectin is so great, but that isn't the point here. Everything
that went against the lockdowns, masks, distance and vaccines had to die. And
so it did. Oh, and of course - as is the theme of this report - none of the
people responsible suffered the slightest consequences.
UPDATE September 2024: yesterday was the 23rd anniversary for the demolition
jobs on the twin towers executed by the US government. And it just dawned on me
that this event provides a really good proof that politics are fake. Heroes of
various camps such as Donald Trump, Robert Kennedy, Bernie Sanders (or whoever
the left likes these days) will never expose the very obvious truth that the
towers have been blown up by the explosives placed therein. Kennedy has
recently admitted (archive)
(MozArchive) he won't
take sides on 9/11, but promised transparency (which would consist of
revealing the fucking bombs, something he is never ever going to do).
more disgusting:
I support legislation by Sen. Chuck Schumer that would allow Americans,
including the families of victims of the 9/11 attacks, to use U.S. courts to
determine if foreign entities are culpable for terrorist attacks in the
United States and seek restitution for the damages and lives lost.
He won't reveal the bombs, but wants to waste yet more time on pointless legal
circus that's designed to seek the culprit anywhere but where he actually is,
with a sprinkle of virtue signaling by appealing to the damages and lives lost.
If you have any doubts about what happened on 9 / 11, just type "building
demolition" into YouTube and see what any other demolition job looks like, then
compare to how the twin towers fell and you will get an exact match.
Here is an example of one such
irrefutable proof that the towers were indeed blown? Don't you think that this
would be something important to reveal to the American people, if these
politicians were really heroes? But they will never do so as they are all under
control of the same so-called "shadow government".
Of course, you could say that maybe some of them really are heroes, they
just can't cover certain topics in order to avoid losing popularity, funding, or
their lives. But if that is so, then it proves my point even better. You can't
get into power unless you hold - or pretend to hold - certain views. And it just
so happens that the required views help the rulers while hurting the plebs. I
think this is a good way to reveal whether a politician is actually worth
anything, BTW. If he is, then he will publicly expose conspiracies such as 9 /
11, the Polish Smoleńsk / Warsaw
massacre, or whatever local
conspiracies might be important in your place of residence. There are a few
deputies who have spoken out against the mainstream Smoleńsk narrative here -
but they are often fined, mocked in the media, etc. And they don't end up
accomplishing anything of note through the official channels. Again proving my
point that success won't be found on this path. The game is rigged!
Therefore, it is obvious that politics cannot be a route for any major, positive
change. And yet, the myth is very important to the rulers. As said before, it
serves as a dead end for people to get trapped in. How this works is explained
perfectly in one of my favorite quotes by Noam Chomsky: The smart way to keep
people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable
opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum. That's why the media
often shows vigorous debates between various politicians and spreads the left
wing / right wing mythology so that people begin to form camps that fight
between each other - all while being unaware that their opinion is
irrelevant, since the rulers control all the provided options (hey, it's
Google vs Mozilla once
again!). They do
everything to direct your focus towards the recent "smart" Trump tweet, the
latest political scandal or yet another fake conflict (Russia or China versus
USA...) so they can continue applying their plans under the veil of distraction.
(MozArchive) an example:
The American Jobs Plan is an investment in America that will create millions
of good jobs, rebuild our country’s infrastructure, and position the United
States to out-compete China
Like great projects of the past, the President’s plan will unify and
mobilize the country to meet the great challenges of our time: the climate
crisis and the ambitions of an autocratic China.
UK's energy security plan aims to boost job creation and reduce reliance on
hostile states like Russia
The government said its approach would seek to reduce dependency on imported
fossil fuels by bolstering the domestic oil and gas industry, investing in
clean technologies, and isolating Russia's regime from global energy
markets.
There's always some hostile state somewhere far away, but never right here. And
so you focus your attention on that hostile state while ignoring how you're
getting fucked by your own government. Because it's not really state vs state,
but rulers vs plebs. Sticking it to "that other country out there" doesn't make
your life better (and probably decreases the quality if anything), but might
make some politician feel better.
Zelensky's extended stay provides further proof that elections are worthless.
Usually, the presidental term is supposed to last five
years
(local) - The President
is elected by Ukrainian citizens by equal vote and direct countrywide elections
for the period of five years. But there are ways to bypass this...like during
war (archive)
(MozArchive), where it
can be extended indefinitely (archive)
(MozArchive) - Since
then, the Ukrainian parliament has extended the duration of martial law and
mobilization 13 times. Insanely, this means that if a warmonger (such as
Zelensky) somehow ends up as president, he can theoretically just continue the
war until his entire country's population is sacrificed. Even though a
non-warmongering president might be what's actually wanted by the citizens, they
will not be able to put him in power since the current one can just keep
extending his term. Seems like quite the "security vuln" of democratic
elections, if there cannot even be elections unless approved by whoever is
ruling at the moment. And of course, this is not only in Ukraine; I just used it
as an example because it's the "current thing".
How to bury a politician: C�lin Georgescu's example
Born in Bucharest in 1962, Georgescu holds a doctorate in pedology, a branch
of soil science, and held different positions in Romania’s environment
ministry in the 1990s, according to his website. Between 1999 and 2012, he
was a representative for Romania on the national committee of the United
Nations Environment Program.
Once a member of Romania’s far-right Alliance for the Unity of Romanians, or
AUR, Georgescu left the party in 2022 after a period of infighting and
being accused by colleagues of being pro-Russian and critical of NATO, the
U.S.-led military alliance to which Romania belongs.
Some of his spicy takes should provide the context for what's going to come:
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/far-right-pro-russian-populist-takes-surprise
-lead-in-romania-elections-7100332> (archive)
(MozArchive) - Mr
Georgescu surged in recent days with a viral TikTok campaign calling for an
end to aid for Ukraine. He has also sounded a sceptical note on Romania's NATO
membership
https://www.newdelhitimes.com/who-is-calin-georgescu-the-far-right-populist-w
ho-won-the-1st-round-of-romanias-presidential-race/>
According to local media, he has praised Russian President Vladimir Putin as
“a man who loves his country” and called Ukraine “an invented state,” but he
claims not to be pro-Russian. He is married with three sons
He supports the Romanian Orthodox Church and has sparked controversy in the
past for describing Romanian fascist and nationalist leaders from the 1930s
and 1940s as national heroes
https://www.courthousenews.com/romania-cracks-the-door-open-to-surprise-ultra
nationalist-presidential-candidate/> - He doubts the 1969 Apollo moon landing
took place and questions the official narrative about the Sept. 11, 2001
terrorist attack. He's an apologist for Romania's World War II fascist
leaders, calling them national heroes. During the Covid-19 pandemic, he
scorned vaccines and said he preferred to rely on his own immune system
(MozArchive) the first
round of the recent elections against all odds; he wasn't even considered a co
ntender (archive) (MozArchive) (ctrl+f
"Georgescu" = no results). At first, a Romanian court accepted the results (archive)
(MozArchive) - Judges
unanimously decided to… confirm and validate the result of the first
presidential round on November 24 and holding the second round on December 8. A
few days later (two days before the second round was supposed to begin) they've
(MozArchive) and voided
the election:
Romania's top court has annulled the results of the first round of the
country's presidential election after claims of Russian interference.
The unprecedented decision came after declassified intelligence documents
alleged Russia was behind a campaign to promote far-right candidate Calin
Georgescu on platforms such as TikTok and Telegram.
HAHAHA, it's claims and alleged. Meaning they have no evidence. And of course,
those declassified intelligence documents magically appeared two days after the
initial decision, and right before Georgescu was about to sweep the second
round, too. His would-be opponent even criticized the decision:
Ms Lasconi criticised the court's decision, arguing the vote should have
continued and respected the will of the Romanian people.
Even though the psychopaths provided no evidence, let's bury their justification
while we're at it. TikTok denied artificial promotion (arch
ive)
(MozArchive) of
Georgescu:
So far, no evidence has been found of a covert influence operation on the
platform in recent weeks related to the presidential elections in Romania,
nor of any external influence, the company representatives concluded.
“More and more absurd accusations are being made by local politicians,
officials and media representatives…,” she added.
“We firmly reject all hostile attacks, which we consider absolutely
groundless.”
there isn't any evidence of wrongdoing in there, at all - Conclusion: The CSAT
documents declassified by the President provide absolutely no real, concrete
basis for the public narratives about a “Russian attack” on Romania or of links
between Georgescu’s campaign and Russia. These documents, by themselves, cannot
rationally be used as arguments against this candidate because they prove
nothing. I can't confirm it but see nothing wrong in his analysis at first
glance.
But even if there was truly Russian interference, who cares? People still went
to the polls and voted for Georgescu. Why not run a counter-propaganda for your
own candidate, if you're so scared of a few Russian bots? When you decide that
elections are invalid just because they were (allegedly; it has not been proven)
influenced by "Russian propaganda", you are basically saying that your citizens
are too stupid to resist the manipulation. "Russian propaganda" appears, takes
over brain, and boom the NPC goes and votes for Georgescu. Nice way to think of
your citizens - wonder what'd they say if you told them that directly? But of
course, it would demolish the entire basis of democratic elections. If you can't
go on TikTok to run your campaign, it basically ensures that only the well
funded candidates (those who can afford billboard ads, TV time, etc...) will get
themselves heard. Which means the power stays in the same hands forever.
Amazing. Yet that is what they actually want and Russia makes a good scapegoat
to bring this situation about.
Why was it so important to deny Georgescu the win?
https://arynews.tv/calin-georgescu-the-man-at-the-centre-of-romania-election/>
“Anything, any policy and any political actor that changes that risks having
not just a major impact on Romania itself, on the course of Romania’s
security and democracy, but also for the security of Europe and of the
Euro-Atlantic area,” she said.
A senior EU diplomat told Reuters after the election’s first round it would
be a “disaster” for the EU if Georgescu won the presidency, noting Romania’s
shared border with Ukraine and the fact it was one of the European bloc’s
larger countries.
https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/romania-s-presidential-election-t
riggers-uncertainty-europe-ukraine-its-allies> (archive)
He pledges to boost defence, build agricultural self-sufficiency, reduce
foreign investment and end national support of the Ukraine war.
https://www.politico.eu/article/romania-presidential-election-calin-georgescu-m
ilitary-nato-russia/> (archive)
But those international ties are deplored by Georgescu, who has condemned
the Deveselu missiles as a national “shame,” campaigned for ending Romanian
aid to Ukraine, and called for “Russian wisdom” in shaping foreign policy.
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20240201STO17291/president-ioh
annis-we-must-stand-by-ukraine-and-its-people> (archive)
Continuing support for Ukraine must be among the EU’s key priorities,
according to the Romanian President. “We must stand by Ukraine and its
people,” he stressed, adding that defending democracy, territorial integrity
and sovereignty, as well as the rules-based international order, cannot be
subject to any “solidarity fatigue”.
And so on. Basically every media outlet focuses on only one main reason - the
war in Ukraine. By not sending any weapons there, Călin would have compromised
psychopath Zelensky's "operation mass male sacrifice", and the army of
Zelensky dick-suckers in the EU just can't have it. I mean, you can mention
Călin's based conspiracy theories and the other stuff, but I don't think they
matter that much. They hate him because he threatened the supremacy of the EU,
of which the male sacrifice in Ukraine is the cornerstone that we've been
propagandized into accepting for the last 3 years. If that's exposed then the
illusion of "EU values" collapses, and maybe takes the entire EU down a peg or
two in general. Maybe we could get more decentralized governments instead of
this behemoth ruling everything. Maybe people would start questioning the
official narratives more often, once a big and influential politician was
actually able to lead a country according to other ideas, and maybe even show
they worked better. Georgescu was in a particularly good position to threaten
the EU because of this:
Making matters worse for pro-EU forces, Romanian presidents wield a lot of
power — unlike many other European political systems — including the ability
to veto legislation, in a fashion similar to France's semi-presidential
form of democracy. Romanian presidents also have clout over foreign affairs,
intelligence agencies and the military while also representing the country
at international institutions and events.
This situation shows that - even if an independent candidate by a thunderstrike
of Zeus gets past all the hurdles inherent in the election system - he won't get
into power if he threatens the status quo. I really hope that - when they
(MozArchive) in May -
Georgescu will sweep again, but I somehow doubt it. I fear they will somehow
modify the process in a way that makes it impossible for him to win, maybe ban
TikTok campaigns at all, etc. Or just fake the votes directly, since that's
clearly not beyond the psychopaths in charge. UPDATE June 2025: late, but
(MozArchive) - Romania's
electoral commission on Sunday banned the candidacy of far-right politician
Calin Georgescu for the upcoming presidential elections. Some Zelensky dick-su
cker (archive) (MozArchive) (Dan, who
is currently the mayor of the capital Bucharest, is a strong supporter of
Romania’s NATO membership and has pledged to continue providing aid to Ukraine
[...]) ended up winning, of course.
How to bury a politician(s), revisited
The Zelensky worshippers did it again
(MozArchive), this time
in Moldova:
The Central Electoral Commission (CEC) has cancelled the registration of
members of the Republican Party Heart of Moldova as candidates at the
parliamentary elections within the Patriotic Electoral Bloc. The decision
was taken today, based on the decision by the Centru Court of Appeal, which
ordered the suspension of the activities of the Republican Party Heart of
Moldova, led by Irina Vlah, for a period of 12 months.
Heh. This time, they didn't wait for them to possibly win, but simply kicked
them out of the competition before it began. They not only can't participate in
the elections, but do pretty much nothing else that's relevant:
"During the period of limiting the activity of the political party, the
latter is prohibited from participating individually or jointly in elections
or referendums, producing, supplying, distributing and disseminating
political advertising, founding mass media, organizing meetings at rallies,
demonstrations, pickets, and other public actions. It is also banned from
using all types of bank deposits, except in cases when discounts with
contractors, payments related to fulfilling individual work contracts,
compensating damages caused by the actions of the political party, and
payments for taxes, duties and fines are necessary," said Pavel Postica.
But why did they incur the wrath of this "Central Electoral Commission"? They
didn't suck Zelensky's dick hard enough. It is very obvious. On September 23,
(MozArchive) with some
psychos from the EU to finish "integrating" Moldova into it:
President Maia Sandu, on September 23 at the Presidency, welcomed the public
officials who had contributed to concluding the evaluation process of
aligning national legislation with European legislation, known as screening,
on the occasion of the successful completion of this decisive step on
Moldova’s path to European integration.
And a big part, maybe even fundamental, of "European legislation" is the mass
male sacrifice in Ukraine.
During the meeting, the head of state expressed gratitude for the intense
work and dedication of the teams from all involved institutions, which, over
the past 15 months, had proved professionalism, responsibility and
perseverance.
Do you think they would bother spending those 15 months of "integration"
attempts just so a pro-Russian party would come and ruin it all by winning and
denying pro-Zelensky bills from passing? Of course not. So they got rid of them
before they could cause any damage. But how did they do so? A few weeks earlier,
(MozArchive) members of
the Heart of Moldova to try to find evidence to condemn them:
According to our sources, security raids are taking place at more than 60
addresses, mainly in Gagauzia and Chisinau. At least seven people have
already been detained, including Vlah's deputy Olesya Tanasoglo.
I have searched the entire Internet for evidence that these people committed any
wrongdoings, but have failed to find any. It's all "suspected" and "alleged".
Therefore, a similar situation to Georgescu's. But even if there was such
evidence - as I said in the previous case - people would still have to go and
vote for their prefered party; no matter how much "financing" you have, it won't
bypass the need to earn the approval of your voters. One way or another, what
happened is totally unjustified. And you can't expect me to believe this was a
coincidence, when it happened twice in a row and somehow never seems to happen
to pro-EU candidates.
Of course, elections - along with the entire legal system - have never been very
successful in shifting the balance of power towards the plebeian, in executing
justice, or in anything else worthy. Yet, it seems that it's only since the
start of the Ukraine war that the psychopaths in charge have dropped all
pretenses. Now, they will simply kick out anyone that even slightly threatens
their dreamed up dystopia. Of course, the pro-Zelensky party ended up winning (archive)
President Maia Sandu’s Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS) had secured 50.2
per cent of the vote with all ballots counted by Monday.
And the expected psychos liked it:
Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky hailed Moldova’s election result,
saying Moscow had failed to “destabilise” the country.
Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, hailed the outcome
in a post on X: “Moldova, you’ve done it again. No attempt to sow fear or
division could break your resolve.”
How shameless. "Moldova's" views were not represented here at all, only those of
the psychos who banned undesirable candidates. Though I'm not going to take
this claim at face value, Russia even says (MozArchive) that
hundreds of thousands of Moldovans were unable to vote in the Russian
Federation, as only two polling stations were opened for them. I wouldn't be
surprised at all, knowing what the psychos are capable of.
The legislative mirage
What about when something beneficial to us happens in the law world? Well, this
works the same way as Mozilla implementing a change that actually helps the user
once a year or so. They simply have to throw us a bone once in a while so that
people celebrate and assume the system is working in their favor. Or, these
supposedly good laws could simply be accidental results bound to happen in a
chaotic world. Anyway, when actually analyzed, these benefits often turn out
to be illusory. Let's take GDPR, a recent law allegedly allowing people to
request the data companies have on them, as well as require consent before - say
- storing cookies on your device:
Most websites are still not compliant with it (archive)
(MozArchive). If the
company has a legitimate interest in setting the cookie, it can stay. But when
does interest cease to be legitimate? According to this document (local) which defines all
the GDPR terms, there are no clear criteria for legitimacy; if you pass a
balancing test (as in, if your interests are judged to be more important than
those of the person's whose data you're processing), you can set the cookie.
Meaning it's something someone else arbitrarily decides on a case-by-case
basis; there is nothing that is banned for sure with this scheme. Some of
the reasons a cookie might be allowed to be set without consent are
conventional direct marketing and other forms of marketing or advertisement,
enforcement of legal claims including debt collection via out-of-court
procedures, and processing for historical, scientific or statistical purposes.
Amazing. This is just another fake initiative that I suspect will barely ever
be applied in favor of the victim and almost always in favor of the
spy...oops I mean data controller. There is even a section called Legitimate
interests of third parties - lol! So GDPR doesn't even bother to prevent
third-party spying. Even if a cookie somehow managed to violate the legitimate
interest rule, would anyone even care? And even if they did care, would the
company actually get punished in a way that
mattered? As said before
- even if you assume honesty of the legal system - it cannot keep up with
all the violations.
GDPR makes websites full of obnoxious cookie
notices you have to click
through. And it turns out that over 99% of people do just that (archive)
(MozArchive) or
completely ignore them, anyway. This isn't really surprising - after all, who
wants to read about all the cookie categories and disable certain ones just to
read a single article that they want to? And then do that for almost every
site they're going to visit? It's just adding more mouse clicks and mental
effort that's already very limited. Clearly, the people coming up with these
insane laws live in dream worlds. In fact, the cookie notice could be
considered a dark pattern in itself. If they were my only option to not be
tracked, I'd just give up using the Web or only read the few sites that I know
don't include them. Fortunately,
uMatrix exists.
Many sites prefer to simply ban European users than follow the law.
There's a possible fine of up to 25 million $ (or 4% of annual revenue if
that's bigger) for violating GDPR. Peanuts for big corpos, a problem for small
fries. Besides, fines don't prevent them from continuing to violate the law
anyway.
Big corpos have the resources to engage in court fights, small fries don't.
There are reports from users saying that ebay, for example, required uploading
your passport before they send you your data. And there's no guarantee you've
got all of it. Nor that they've deleted it if requested.
As you can see, GDPR is yet another colossal governmental failure, so common
whenever they try to regulate the Internet. Of course, the solution isn't to
let businesses do anything they want to, as that would be a way bigger
disaster. You
could try to make examples of a few of the biggest violators by throwing them in
jail (but this assumes that the legal system isn't compromised in the first
place), or just take away the incentives to be evil, which consist of mostly
profit, but not only. Of
course, uMatrix and other client-side solutions also sidestep the entire legal
conundrum, and are quite acceptable for now. Long term, though, we need
deeper changes.
Anyway, let's look at some other examples of supposedly good laws that are not
so good when examined more closely. Maine lawmakers pass bill to prevent ISPs
from selling browsing data without
consent (archi
ve)
(MozArchive). First of
(MozArchive) that came
before it. Also, Maine is just one place out of millions in the world. How many
people will really benefit? ISPs can still do lots of malicious things like show
you ads, block VPNs or torrents, slow down connections on purpose, falsely
advertise internet speeds, etc. Where are the laws against those? And it has to
be asked what will be the consequences against ISPs violating this new law (I
suspect nothing or a tiny fine as usual).
Regardless of how good you think the GDPR or the above law is, for every one
like it, a hundred bad ones get implemented in the meantime - such as
(MozArchive) (which would
allow silently adding a law enforcement participant to a group chat or call),
(MozArchive), and many,
many others. Then consider the thousands upon thousands of ancient laws that
harm us to this day, such as the ones shoving kids into the torture chamber
known as school. It always makes
me cringe when people send letters or petitions trying to get a law stopped. I
mean do you really think that's going to work? They know what they're doing and
have no obligation to listen to the plebeians (that's me and you and anyone else
who writes them). Even if such a letter succeeded, you'd have to send millions
of those to tackle all the shit laws. You think you can do it? Good luck.
Ross Scott's campaign for game preservation provides a pretty much perfect
example of the folly of this strategy. By the way, I have nothing whatsoever
against him or his endeavors; in fact I think he's absolutely based. But
regardless, the whole thing was undoubtedly a failure, despite the extreme
effort he's put into it. So extreme, he's even called
it The largest campaign ever to stop
publishers destroying games consisting of Legal action in many countries.
Spoiler: it only ended up showing just how little effect we have on things by
"official" ways, and how little basic respect the "officials" have for us. But
let's start with the beginning: what is the campaign even about?
With the current laws (in seemingly all countries), a video game company can
release a game that requires an online server to play, then pull the plug at any
moment, leaving the buyers with a nonfunctional product. In this
video, Ross states that he certainly
doesn't know of a way to legally preserve an online multiplayer game if the
publisher doesn't want you to. Fixing which is the heart of his campaign. What
are the effects so far?
In a December update video he says
that the Canadian government passed the buck for the consideration of his
proposal onto the provinces - of which two have already rejected it (and none
accepted). Australian government has basically dismissed the idea. The UK
petition was resubmitted after the previous
failure (archive)
(MozArchive), in which
the government mocked us with a giant word-salad, pretty much admitting that the
companies' commercial interests trump the users' expectations. Funnily, Ross
says he was actually invited to some European consumer
organization (archive)
(MozArchive) meeting
where they covered gaming issues including this one, and asked for statistics of
the prevalence of "dead games". To him, it seemed that this venue is the least
likely to be effective; I kind of disagree, since well, he has actually managed
to worm himself into a seat at the discussion table. Yet - even though the
organization's website says that they are acknowledged as a trustworthy
representative by decision-makers - they are not a legislative body
themselves; and so far, they have been ignored. Besides, if the sentiment is
that "more proof that this is even a problem is needed" (which it was in this
meeting), then we've already lost. Video game (a type of art) preservation needs
to be accepted as something with inherent value, but that's not the way it
looks like to the legislators. Big business is given the benefit of the doubt,
as it always is. If things worked properly, governments would have already made
it a crime to bury a game; the developer would be required to release it in a
way that allows offline play after they kill the servers. To make it really
hardcore - once commercial gains stop being made from an installment - require
releasing the source for it, too, as well as giving up all rights (to that
specific installment, not necessarily the entire IP). Now that would be quite
based! A year of the citizens' campaign should be enough for something like this
(if we truly had the power), but there has been absolutely zero success so far
(because we don't) - all while increasing number of games (again, art pieces)
are dying forever.
Another example of the ineffectiveness of the official channels is when a polish
naturopath (Jerzy Zięba) tried for years to get politicians to change some
baseless or harmful medical norms - like the ones about cholesterol, etc (he
says this in some of his interviews). And he had evidence for all his claims (he
has connections to world renowned experts on many issues such as virology,
nutrition, heart issues, etc). But he was ignored either way. It's obvious that
the medical norms are controlled by the industry and that the regular citizen
cannot affect them. This presumably applies to every single issue out there. How
can we speak of democracy at all, in this case?
There is no democracy
Some people have complained about how stupid democracy is because stupid people
get to vote. Or because it's tyranny of the majority. Or because it's two wolves
deciding to eat the sheep. But that's surface level thinking. Guess what
democracy actually means (archive)
The word “democracy” comes from two Greek words that mean people (demos) and
rule (kratos).
And how it's supposed to play out in practice:
Each year 500 names were chosen from all the citizens of ancient Athens.
Those 500 citizens had to actively serve in the government for one year.
During that year, they were responsible for making new laws and controlled
all parts of the political process. When a new law was proposed, all the
citizens of Athens had the opportunity to vote on it.
Have you ever been asked whether you want COVID
restrictions or
during the "pandemic"?
Have you ever been asked whether you want your country to send tanks to
Ukraine, and how many?
Have you ever been asked whether you want advertisements to be displayed outside, and
what kind of, and how many?
Have you ever been asked whether you want your children to be thrown into
school or how the "curriculum"
should look like?
Have you ever been asked whether you want GM
foods to be
labeled in
your country? Or if they could even be sold at all?
Have you ever been asked about...anything that matters?
If not, then how the FUCK can the current system be called a democracy? It
is the exact opposite of the original Athenian democracy. Using that word to
describe whatever we have right now is literal Orwellian doublethink. Because
the amount of influence your average citizen has right now is exactly zero.
I have literally never seen anyone speak about democracy positively, because
they all associate it with the modern rule by the 0.001%. But actually, if we
had Athenian democracy in every city (or even per smaller area), then nothing
would be able to pass without at least most people living there agreeing with
it. It would still not be a panacea (people could still choose dumb laws, or be
bribed by big corporations etc; and maybe running society according to something
rigid like "laws" isn't the best option anyway) - but a massive improvement
over the current system which has a small group of psychopaths stepping on the
plebs who can only receive the boot. And yet everyone these days has a knee jerk
reaction against the one thing that could actually fix this world.
Athenian democracy - by the way - would be really easy to do through the
Internet. I mean, just have a HTML form with all the "current things" votable
every month or so. Many ways this could go wrong, of course; someone would still
have to come up with the votable issues, and ensure to frame them neutrally.
There'd need to be good security on the backend so that no one could double-vote
or vote for someone else. Of course, you'd probably have to dox yourself to the
website and prove your location - but you do that with "regular" voting anyway;
and this one would actually accomplish something. There'd need to be full
transparency with publicly available anonymized voting results in real time, so
that the current rulers cannot cheat and bypass the people's wishes to push
their prefered policies. But again, even a badly done Athenian democracy would
be much better than what we have currently. No excuse to not at least try it.
COVID slavery exposes the legal beast
This is old news at this point, but it's only recently that I dug into the
relevant documents and found some really juicy stuff in there. To be specific -
on March 2020, the Polish government approved a set of
modifications to the
existing laws. Much of these consist of boring administrative stuff about the
delivery of medicines, etc. I will skip all those and move straight to the meat
of it:
„Art. 34. 1. W celu zapobiegania szerzeniu się zakażeń i chorób zakaźnych,
osoby chore na chorobę zakaźną albo osoby podejrzane o zachorowanie na
chorobę zakaźną mogą podlegać obowiązkowej hospitalizacji.
Translation (will be skipping law names and other fluff for this and all
subsequent translations):
In order to prevent the spread of infections and infectious diseases, people
infected or assumed to be infected can be subjected to forced
hospitalization
Amazing. Just the "assumption" that you were sick was enough to shove you into
the hospital, where you were likely to be harmed or killed without any possible
way to resist, as visits were banned and medical workers spared any legal
consequences related to applying official COVID treatments.
2. Osoby zdrowe, które pozostawały w styczności z osobami chorymi na choroby
zakaźne podlegają obowiązkowej kwarantannie lub nadzorowi
epidemiologicznemu, jeżeli tak postanowią organy inspekcji sanitarnej przez
okres nie dłuższy niż 21 dni, licząc od ostatniego dnia styczności.
Translation:
Healthy people, who were in contact with infected people are subject to
mandatory quarantine or epidemiological supervision, if decided by the
institutions of sanitary inspection. The duration will be no more than 21
days, counting from the last day of contact.
If you were found to be in contact with a "COVID case", you would be imprisoned
for up to 21 days. We knew that already. But that's not the worst of it:
3. Obowiązkowa kwarantanna lub nadzór epidemiologiczny, o których mowa w
ust. 2, mogą być stosowane wobec tej samej osoby więcej niż raz, do czasu
stwierdzenia braku zagrożenia dla zdrowia lub życia ludzkiego
Translation:
Mandatory quarantine or epidemiological supervision can be used against
the same person more than once, until the lack of danger to human health
or life is confirmed
Ha! In theory, the "COVID act" enabled locking someone up indefinitely. Let's
not forget that COVID tests do not
prove that someone is
sick or can spread the sickness, so this stipulation never had an evidential
basis. The parts following this one are pretty boring and expected, but what's
coming after will absolutely shock you. Equip the Shield of the Damned and get
ready for the thunderstrike:
„Art. 44a. 1. Jeżeli użycie innych sił i środków jest niemożliwe lub może
okazać się niewystarczające, Minister Obrony Narodowej może przekazać do
dyspozycji Głównego Inspektora Sanitarnego lub wojewody, na którego obszarze
podejmowane są działania związane ze stanem zagrożenia epidemicznego,
stanem epidemii albo w razie niebezpieczeństwa szerzenia się zakażenia lub
choroby zakaźnej, które może stanowić zagrożenie dla zdrowia publicznego, w
szczególności wystąpienia choroby szczególnie niebezpiecznej lub wysoce
zakaźnej, pododdziały lub oddziały Sił Zbrojnych Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej,
wraz ze skierowaniem ich do wykonywania zadań z tym związanych.
Translation:
In case the other means prove inadequate, the Minister of National Defense
can place the Polish Armed Forces at the disposal of the Chief Sanitary
Inspector or governor of the province where there is (a danger of) an
epidemic of a particularly infectious or serious disease, and assign them
to execute relevant actions.
Mask off moment for the "COVID act". The government was ready to send the army
on your ass if you broke restrictions too much. Though they don't say it
directly, the relevant actions is all-encompassing, and must by definition
include killing. After all, why was the army specifically brought as a final
solution? What are they able to do that the other institutions are not? Mass
killing, of course. And it doesn't matter that it didn't end up happening, only
that the rulers were prepared to execute it if the conditions demanded it (eg.
mass violations of restrictions which of course had no chance in this country of
cowards).
There is more after this about "zero COVID zones" and similar China-tier stuff
that I don't care to cover, as I think involving the army proves my point well
enough. So this is the act that got applied in Poland very soon after corona
became a sensation. This shows the rulers can act fast if they need to (eg. to
worsen our slavery). I suspect many countries had similar ones, but can't be
bothered to confirm ATM (if you have any idea, E-mail me). Anyway, can you guess
(MozArchive) the
modifications?
Za ustawą uchwaloną przez Sejm 2 marca opowiedzieli się wszyscy biorący
udział w głosowaniu posłowie PiS - 226 osób, 113 na 114 biorących udział w
głosowaniu posłów KO (jeden poseł, Tomasz Lenz, głosował przeciw), 42 na 43
uczestniczących w głosowaniu posłów Lewicy (od głosu wstrzymała się posłanka
Wanda Nowicka), z klubu PSL-Kukiz'15 18 posłów poparło ustawę, a 6
wstrzymało się od głosu, ustawę poparł też poseł niezrzeszony Ryszard Galla,
a wszyscy biorący udział w głosowaniu posłowie Konfederacji głosowali
przeciw ustawie.
CBF translating directly but all 226 deputies of PiS and 113 out of 114 deputies
of KO (two main parties) voted for it, then 42 out of 43 and 15 out of 18 from
some alternative parties. Only the far right party Konfederacja was fully
against it, but of course, they have comparably few members and the slavery act
ended up passing by an almost unanimous decision regardless of their opposition
to it.
This example perfectly showcases how the legal system is designed to fuck us
over. The slavery act appeared on the deputies' desks, and boom 6 days later it
got approved and we became slaves without any "official" way of resisting. If
you did it "unofficially" and were persistent enough, the army would be waiting
to wipe you and your revolutionary buddies out. And during the "pandemic", you
were enslaved whether you were a "marginalized" autistic black transwoman or the
supposedly most "privileged" straight white Christian man. I'm mentioning this
because lately, the sentiment that some groups of plebeians somehow avoid the
oppression, or even are themselves the oppressors, is becoming more and more
popular. It's a joke totally disproved by the COVID situation, as well as by the
schooling system, CCTV surveillance, and everything else that we are all
subjected to. The oppression goes from the rulers to the plebs, and not from
whites to blacks or any of the myriad other inter-pleb combinations. The rulers
are non-discriminatory in their abuse, yet people keep falling for the division
tactics. Keep this in mind the next time you hear about "X pleb group rights",
and remember that during the "pandemic", we all had none.
Protests don't work
On January 31, 2023, 1.27 million French people
(MozArchive) against the
upcoming rise in retirement age from 62 to 64 years old:
For comparison, on January 31, the biggest day of demonstrations so far,
some 1.27 million took part, according to official figures.
On March 7, another one happened - this time with two million people:
trade unions announced that “more than two million people” would take part
in rallies on Tuesday.
Late on Saturday, 195 senators voted in favor of the plans, with 112
opposing them
See? The rulers do not care about your opinion. But the protests are continuing
still. Remember what Einstein said about insanity? Do you really think they'd
let you do something that actually threatened the power structure? That's why
it's so funny when people tell you to "check the laws in your area" - or
something similar - before going to a protest. Isn't that missing the point?
Think about it: your rulers have bothered you enough for you to go to a protest,
but you will let them tell you how to protest? Hell, look at this guide to
Groups are allowed to use banners or signs, but restrictions may be placed
on the size of the banners and signs as well as the material used in the
construction. Signs may not be fastened to wooden sticks, for example, so
demonstrators often afix signs to cardboard tubing or simply hold them.
Heh, they are even limiting fucking sign sizes and materials - almost as if the
signs were some kind of explosive weapons.
Neither signs nor banners are permitted to be attached to public property
such as light posts or telephone poles.
Of course, the "public" property belongs to your rulers, don't you dare touch
it, peasant!
Try to obey law enforcement’s instructions [...] Never interfere with an
officer who is approaching or arresting someone during the event
As seen above, a "legal protest" always requires you to bow down in the end.
When it gets too spicy, the rulers will just send their Kapo pawns (the police)
to break it up. As if protests weren't ineffective enough already, following
"legalities" ensures they will be completely toothless. It should be obvious -
almost tautological - that bowing down to an abuser doesn't do anything long
term. If he enjoys abusing his favorite human pets, and knows he's not going to
suffer any consequence for it, why would he stop? In fact, he will increase the
brutality more and more; that is exactly what happens in abusive relationships.
At least, until the victim dares to resist - in a way that actually worries the
perpetrator, instead of one he would laugh at (AKA "legal protests" or the
chihuahua's barking). And this is why the chest-puffing right wingers end up
hurting everyone when they scream "fed!
fed!" (archive)
(MozArchive) at anyone
who dares to suggest resistance; they are the ones helping the rulers by
insisting on dead ends.
European Slavery Union wants to take over all media
I just learned (from an obscure Polish blog no less) that the EU has unleashed
(MozArchive) the
(local) a few
days ago, which (in the marketing materials) is supposed to "support
journalistic independence" and similar noble-sounding nonsense. But this kind of
portrayal hides the deeper, more horrifying reality of it - one that no media
outlet has covered so far. So let me do it, and remember to hold your gaming
chair tightly:
Let's start with determining who does this law even apply to. The EU defines
"media service" like this:
‘media service’ means a service as defined by Articles 56 and 57 TFEU, where
the principal purpose of the service or a dissociable section thereof
consists in providing programmes or press publications, under the editorial
responsibility of a media service provider, to the general public, by any
means, in order to inform, entertain or educate;
Okay, I think this makes it clear enough. If you write a press publication, in
order to inform, entertain or educate, by any means you are subject to the new
(MozArchive) what press
publications are:
‘press publication’ means a collection composed mainly of literary works of
a journalistic nature, but which can also include other works or other
subject matter, and which:
constitutes an individual item within a periodical or regularly updated
publication under a single title, such as a newspaper or a general or
special interest magazine;
has the purpose of providing the general public with information related to
news or other topics; and
is published in any media under the initiative, editorial responsibility and
control of a service provider.
Periodicals that are published for scientific or academic purposes, such as
scientific journals, are not press publications for the purposes of this
Directive;
So, does the Dig Deeper digital newspaper fit? I don't see anything in it
violating the definition. Unless I am somehow not a service provider? But again,
this seems like a weak tree branch to grab in hopes that it will save me from
falling into the lake full of EU crocodiles - especially since the main
definition seems to cover writing by any means. What we know 100% from
here
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20250602120002/https://eur-lex.europa.eu/
legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX%3A12012E%2FTXT]
(local) is that anyone running a
commercial media service absolutely will be subject to these, no question:
Services shall be considered to be ‘services’ within the meaning of the
Treaties where they are normally provided for remuneration, in so far as
they are not governed by the provisions relating to freedom of movement for
goods, capital and persons. ‘Services’ shall in particular include: (a)
activities of an industrial character; (b) activities of a commercial
character; (c) activities of craftsmen; (d) activities of the professions.
But that's still really vague; are people who offer (but don't require) donation
options included? No one knows, and it's something that would doom me and many
bloggers. Nor does this explicitly keep the non-commercial writers off the hook.
So again, we don't have total confirmation of who's exactly going to be subject
to the new laws, but it does look like they tried to cast the net as widely as
they could, without stating it directly. But what's so horrible about these
policies, anyway? If you have a shield or helmet nearby, now is the time to
equip it:
1. Media service providers shall make easily and directly accessible to the
recipients of their services up-to-date information on: (a) their legal name
or names and contact details
My legal name is Sagma Digg, nice to meet you.
To further contribute to a high level of media ownership transparency,
Member States should also entrust national regulatory authorities or bodies,
or other competent authorities and bodies, with developing media ownership
databases. Such databases should work as a one-stop shop allowing recipients
of media services to easily check the relevant information related to a
given media service provider.
So there will be a global, EU-wide database of who owns which media outlet. Or
in other words, the end of anonymous publishing (assuming you will cuck,
which you - as the reader of this site - surely won't, right?). Of course, you
could say that maybe they are meaning to apply this only to owners of media
outlets, for whom other journalists write. Though it's a stretch, and not really
supported by the earlier quotes (or anything I can find in the entire doc),
even that wouldn't really save the new policies, for this reason:
Intrusive surveillance software should only be deployed where it is
justified by an overriding reason of public interest [...]
Ha! So spyware can be deployed against journalists if EU psychos decide
there is public interest riding on it (until now, every member state decided
whether and in which cases to deploy the spyware; from now on it will be
enforced from above). After this quote, comes a bunch of requirements that
supposedly have to be satisfied to be able to use this method, including a
judge's approval, but I don't think this will be really hard to receive for the
psychos - nor that they won't break it if they want to, anyway. The point is,
once the door for spying has been opened, the journalist can't really feel free
to report what he wants to (chilling effect). So much for "journalistic
independence". They realize it, BTW:
Intrusive surveillance software, including, in particular, what is commonly
referred to as ‘spyware’, represents a particularly invasive form of
surveillance over media professionals and their sources. It can be deployed
to secretly record calls or otherwise use the microphone of an end-user
device, film or photograph natural persons, machines or their surroundings,
copy messages, access encrypted content data, track browsing activity, track
geolocation or collect other sensor data, or track activities across
multiple end-user devices. It has dissuasive effects on the free exercise
of economic activities in the media sector. It jeopardises, in particular,
the trusted relationship of journalists with their sources, which is the
core of the journalistic profession. Given the digital and intrusive
nature of such software and the use of devices across borders, it has a
particularly detrimental impact on the exercise of economic activities by
media service providers in the internal market. It is therefore necessary to
ensure that media service providers, including journalists, operating in
the internal market for media services can rely on robust harmonised
protection in relation to the deployment of intrusive surveillance software
in the Union, including where Member State authorities resort to private
parties to deploy it.
No, what's required is to just let them do their jobs, and stop prying. But why
pry in the first place? Let's turn off our conspiracy theory modules for a
while, and try to figure out why even implement all these measures, from the
point of view of the government?
Thirdly, the good functioning of the internal market for media services is
challenged by providers, including those controlled by certain third
countries, that systematically engage in disinformation or information
manipulation and interference, and use the internal market freedoms for
abusive purposes, thus thwarting the proper functioning of market dynamics.
In a well-functioning internal market, recipients of media services should
be able to access quality media services which have been produced by
journalists in an independent manner and in line with ethical and
journalistic standards and which, therefore, provide trustworthy
information.
disseminated in diverse ways, including by uploading it to online platforms.
Quality media services are also an antidote against disinformation and
foreign information manipulation and interference. Access to such services
should also be ensured by preventing attempts to silence journalists,
ranging from threats and harassment to censorship and cancelling of
dissenting opinions, which could limit the free flow of information into the
public sphere by reducing the quality and plurality of information.
It's to prevent disinformation especially from certain third countries that
perform foreign information manipulation and interference. Hmm, I wonder what
those countries could be? Nepal maybe? Thailand? Equatorial Guinea? Sorry I'm
running blank, but it's surely not the big bad Russia. When the EU says they
want journalism to be produced "independently" and ensure "quality information",
it's a cover for keeping Russia out of it. So yeah, just like you need to be
sucking Zelensky's dick to get into politics - as someone has already
learned - and
(MozArchive) is about to
follow him - soon you'll need to be doing the same to get into the media. Which
I strongly suspect will also include personal sites. At least that's the EU
psycho dream, they might still not have the resources to follow up on everyone;
but picking and choosing particularly important targets will still be a
possibility. And as usual, this is yet another law that's been prepared without
input from the plebeians, in order to prevent them from realizing how vile and
nonsensical Zelensky's propaganda is, while pretending to have noble aims.
If you're wondering why blocking and / or punishing the spread of the so-called
"Russian propaganda" is so evil, realize that you can't really know anything
about any topic if you only stick to "one side" (which in Polish media consists
exclusively of Zelensky dick-sucking). Especially if it relates to war - the
first casualty of war is the truth. That is why you need to be able to examine
what both sides of the conflict say, or even independent commentators - but the
EU psychos don't want to let you do that. They want your "research" to consist
of slogans about hero Zelensky bravely fighting the full-scale Russian invasion,
while ignoring the trucks dragging (archive)
(MozArchive) innocent
Ukrainian men to the front line to die (even attempting to do that to 14 year
olds (archive)
(MozArchive)), his
(MozArchive), his
robbery of hundreds of billions of dollars from Europe / USA, his illegitimate
extension of presidency, etc. So - no matter how hard the EU psychos pretend
these new laws are just about protecting "journalistic freedom" - they can't
fool me. What they actually want is to be able to hunt down reporters (including
what up until now were anonymous internet ones) who question their delusional
Zelensky-worshipping narrative by either putting them into some dystopian global
database of anyone who has ever written anything, and / or putting spyware on
their devices to grab evidence to punish them later. Of course, long term, this
will end up affecting not only Zelensky's critics, but everyone - and forever.
One official narrative to rule them all is the final goal of this scheme.
Fines don't work
Have you ever heard of a corporate big fish being jailed? Me neither. That is
regardless of corporations being responsible for causing someone's cancer (archive)
(MozArchive) through
their products, and burying the evidence. Or bribing doctors to promote drugs
proven to cause harm (archive)
(MozArchive) for
unapproved (illegal) uses. What would happen if you sold a poisoned doughnut on
the streets? Probably an immediate jail time if caught. But for the corporate
higher-ups, it's always either a slap on the wrist or a fine. That is if they
are even required to pay them...
Apple fine was canceled (archive)
(MozArchive). Facebook is
not even confirmed yet (UPDATE July 2023: they were fined in 2019, still
can't find a confirmation they've actually paid). Three of four Google's fines
(as well as the Intel one) are being appealed (UPDATE July 2023: hey, Google
actually lost an appeal (archive)
(MozArchive). Finally,
someone has at least paid; even though this barely put a
dent in their
earnings), and the remaining one was tiny in comparison. Oh, and I tried to find
the resolution to the Intel fine, too, and guess what - 13 years later it got
canceled (archive)
(MozArchive). Do you now
see the pointlessness of this whole fining circus? 13 years of legal screwing
around, and nothing came out of it. How about the banking fines? With how much
money they have, they pretty much end up being just slaps on the wrist -
JPMorgan Chase is the largest bank in the United States, and is ranked by S&P
Global as the sixth largest bank in the world by total assets as of 2018, to the
amount of $2.535 trillion. So the fine is not even 1% of what they have.
Besides, they can just print more (archive)
(MozArchive). As we can
see, fining corpos is nothing more than a theater, and the people responsible
for their crimes never suffer any direct consequences regardless of the harm
they do.
UPDATE: it is 2022, and I want to give a hard, mathematical proof that fines
On December 31, 2021, the CNIL fined GOOGLE a total of 150 million euros (90
million euros for GOOGLE LLC and 60 million euros for GOOGLE IRELAND
LIMITED) because users of google.fr and youtube.com can't refuse or accept
cookies as easily.
A 150 million euro fine! Surely, Google will never recover from this. RIP.
UPDATE 2023: the report for the full year is
in, and the situation
is even worse than it seemed:
Ruth Porat, CFO of Alphabet and Google, said: “Our Q4 consolidated revenues
were $76 billion, up 1% year over year, or up 7% in constant currency, and
$283 billion for the full year 2022
That's 775 million USD per day, which is 704.5 million EUR (by the April 2022
conversion rate of 1.10). They have regained the losses in less than a day
(actually about 5 hours)! Have the officials really not learned basic math in
school? Or maybe they've just been bribed; it doesn't really matter. The fact is
that the fines are mathematically proven to be useless.
There is another aspect to be considered here. What HAS Google actually been
fined for? Turns out it's because you can't deny their tracking cookies easily
enough - Several clicks are required to refuse all cookies, against a single one
to accept them. This is fine, the problem here is that it's only one of
hundreds of abuses that Google is doing. They are still shoving reCAPTCHA up
your face (and training their AI with it). Still sending a truck of data with
every Google Chrome startup. Still collecting your internet habits from all the
sites that use Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager or other Google trash. And
correlating it all with the YouTube videos that you watch and the Gmails that
you send. And since they are apart of PRISM, all of that is being sent to the
feds. Then consider all the disgusting
censorship they are
employing on their search engine. Is it not obvious that punishing them for some
cookies doesn't really matter?
Imagine Google as a country that is going to war. So they are deploying
thousands of tanks, hundreds of fighter jets, and millions of ground troops with
their high tech weapons. Obviously, they're crushing any poor country they've
invaded in days. Finally, people manage to kill one of Google's soldiers, and
this is proclaimed as some great victory. All while the wave of tanks and jets
is still taking a dump on the country. Add to that alliances with other
malicious "countries" like Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter,
Mozilla, Amazon and Cloudflare
and you realize there is no way to win this war by removing singular
"soldiers" - when the violating "countries" have trained a hundred more in that
time. Hell, forget the "killing" of the soldier, since it's doubtful Google will
stop the tracking cookie violations anyway - so make that "maiming". Against
the whole of Google's army (plus their allies), all we've managed to do is MAIM
(not even kill) one of their soldiers. Does anyone still think the legal system
works? Even if you assume honesty, it cannot keep up with all the
violations.
You can't run away
During the early lockdowns, someone on a forum I was on back then, asked for a
safe place to settle to avoid NWO bullshit. He got a few answers like Japan or
Belarus. But, the plandemic actually made it clear that the entire world is
compromised already. Sure, there are better and worse places, but evil has
placed its hands everywhere. Now I do not know the situation in every place out
there, but it is obvious that the entirety of Europe, USA, Canada, Australia,
New Zealand, China (just for a few major examples) went extremely dystopian.
Sure, there were outliers like Sweden and Belarus and some USA states that did a
few things differently, but Pfizer still ruled the roost. You couldn't find a
vitamin D dispenser site anywhere, debate wasn't encouraged, tests were shitty
everywhere, death stats probably faked everywhere, etc. If you were putting your
hopes into Africa, South America, or smaller Asian countries - forget it.
Remember the mysteriously dead
presidents? I surely am not
familiar with every one of those places, but check
this, as an
example:
Countries like Taijikistan were still being shoved (archive)
(MozArchive) the vaccines
by the WHO and other NWO spawns. Later, Taijikistan actually became (archive)
(MozArchive) the first
country that mandated the snake venom. So think long and hard whether those
lesser known places are good tourist destinations... And remember, we have only
covered COVID so far, and didn't touch all the other bullshit every country out
there is doing. Even if running away to some place in Africa was viable, why
should we do it? Why give up a higher quality (presumably) life in Europe or
America? Why be forced to learn a new language? Why waste the money, give up the
friends and everything? And how long would that place remain untouched by the
hands of evil, anyway? It is clear that running away is at best a temporary
solution that's also giving up way too much, and at worst, a total surrender to
the forces of darkness. Stop running! There's nowhere to run. We have to fight
for our current places of residence.
The courts are compromised, too
So don't expect them to protect you or give you mercy. If you do anything that
even slightly bothers the rulers - anything that might shake up the power
structure - they will find some law out there (thousands to pick from) that you
allegedly violated and use that to punish you with the highest possible
brutality level. As an example, let's use that time a Polish farmer was punished
for hanging this banner on his tractor:
The direct translation is Putin, please clean up Ukraine, Brussels and our own
government. It doesn't translate well, and I suspect you don't know Polish
language, so let me tell you that zrób porządek (what a dictionary would
translate as clean up even though I don't think it's the most meaningful
translation) is the same term you'd use when doing a cleaning in your house,
rearranging cables in your computer or tools in your cupboard, or even handling
emotions that are running wild. Basically it's used whenever there is a
situation to fix that's currently broken, so that's the English term I'd use,
that or "install order". With that said, can you guess what they got him for (archive)
Po przedstawieniu zarzutów rolnikowi nawoływania publicznego do wszczęcia
wojny napastniczej przeciwko Polsce, pochwalenia wojny napastniczej wobec
Ukrainy, a także propagowania ustroju komunistycznego, na obecnym etapie
oczekujemy na opinię sądowo-psychiatryczną dotyczącą tego podejrzanego.
Translation:
After accusing the farmer of public calling for the invasion of Poland,
supporting the invasion of Ukraine, and spreading communist regime, at the
moment we're waiting for the psychiatric judgment about the accused.
The fucking calling for invasion was what got him. But can the insane psycho
prosecutor and her media minions show me just where exactly does he do that in
the banner? Am I waging war against my shelves when cleaning my room? Am I
waging war against my diet when I add healthy food to it? That's how the
mainstream is expecting you to think. Besides - even if Putin somehow read the
banner (which is already extremely unlikely) and interpreted it this way (he
wouldn't) - it's not like he'd then think "oh, this Polish farmer supports me, I
now must triple my war efforts". You can't be "calling for war" with any
relevant effect if the warlords are ignoring you (assuming you even accept the
questionable mainstream theory of the war being caused exclusively by Putin's
insane imperialist dreams). Who is actually supporting the war in Ukraine? The
USA / EU politicians, of course, when they send weapons (archive)
(MozArchive) there. I
mean is there any more direct way of supporting a war even possible? War can't
happen without weapons. And yet the rulers are not going to punish themselves
for sustaining it, of course. On the other hand, they will punish a random
farmer who can't affect anything anyway.
The message in that banner actually sounds positive to me; what with removing
the bad people in the stated governments and replacing them with better ones, or
giving them better organization? That's what a natural reading of the sentence
would suggest. Let me reiterate, there is absolutely nothing here about
calling for or supporting any war. Again, this situation shows that the rulers
will get you whenever they want to, and you don't need to have done what they
accuse you of. By the way, it was moderately hard to find a photo of the banner;
most of the media sites appear to have scrubbed it. I guess they don't want you
to know just why people are being dragged through the court system in the first
place; you're just supposed to accept your place as the plebeian that receives
whippings. And of course, the psychos can't simply wait for the trial, they're
going to bully this poor farmer into total mental destruction before finishing
him off when he receives his actual punishments:
Wobec Piotra G. zastosowano dozór policyjny. Trzy razy w tygodniu musi
zgłaszać się na policję, oraz poręczenie majątkowe w wysokości 5 tysięcy
złotych. Rolnikowi i jego córce grozi 5 lat więzienia.
Translation:
Police supervision has been applied against Piotr G. Three times per week he
has to visit the police station, as well as pay bail of 5 thousand zlotys
(about 1K USD / EUR). Him and his daughter could be punished with 5
years of prison.
Since he's going to undergo psychiatric evaluation they are probably going to
get him to admit he's insane (maybe with a promise of reduced sentence), and
then happily run a media smear campaign on him, with the implication that
Brian Thompson's assassination shows what works
On December 4, 2024, the CEO of UnitedHealthcare - a medical insurance company -
outside the Hilton hotel at 1335 Avenue of the Americas just after 6.45am after
arriving early for the company’s annual investor conference in New York City,
USA. I have uploaded the footage
so that you can receive the context for this section. Now look at the
Health insurer Medica temporarily closed its Minnetonka, Minnesota,
headquarters as a safety precaution [...]
CVS and other health care companies have removed photographs of CEOs and
other executive leaders from their websites [...]
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield said Thursday that the health insurance
provider is reversing a policy that was set to go into effect in February
that would have limited anesthesia coverage during surgeries and other
procedure [...]
Can you recall a protest ever having this kind of effect? How about fines?
Lawsuits? Voting? "Voting with your wallet"? Posting internet memes? It's so
funny - even magical - to see the other health insurance companies panic so
fast. But why would the killer even be pushed to end the CEO's life? Maybe
because the health insurance companies often pull crap like this (archive)
Democrats on the U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI)
released a report claiming UnitedHealthcare’s prior authorization denial
rate for post-acute care jumped from 10.9% in 2020 to 22.7% in 2022.
Imagine if you had a relative dying from cancer, heart failure, or something
else that's debilitating and requires quick treatment - and he got denied or
delayed the care, and died. Of course, logically, the more a company rejects
insurance claims, the more money it will earn (or rather, will be able to spend
less) - which again reveals the problems with for-profit
medicine. And,
UnitedHealthcare just happened to have the highest industry rate of claim
rejection. These days, they are even outsourcing this job to AI:
The suit claimed the company illegally deployed "artificial intelligence
(AI) in place of real medical professionals to wrongfully deny elderly
patients care owed to them under Medicare Advantage Plans by overriding
their treating physicians’ determinations as to medically necessary care
based on an AI model."
Seems obvious to me that the killer either had his own - or more likely one of
his family member's - treatment denied, and sought the only way of resistance he
could think of. Though I guess it's not the only possible explanation; a
competitor corporation getting angry at the "success" of this one could also
have spurred this incident. However, that explanation becomes unlikely when you
Deny, Defend, Depose refering to the tactics used by the insurance companies.
In the end it doesn't matter that much because...
...The social media sentiment is surprisingly pro-assassin and has united
various political creeds in a way that I haven't seen happen before. A friend
told me that Out of the 9200 emoji reactions to the official announcement of his
death on the company's Facebook page, 9000 were laughing or "haha" emojis.
Edit: current numbers appears to be several times higher, with a ratio of about
12 "happy" reactions to 1 sad one. A significant reason for this is that the
killer didn't write any manifestos or anything else that would expose his
political leanings, so no camp has anything to hate him for. The other is surely
that most people in the USA have been screwed over by the insurance companies
at some point. The only entity that has a problem with the killer is the
mainstream media (archive)
(MozArchive) - "The
framing of this incident as some opening blow in a class war and not a brutal
murder is especially alarming”. But even they can't pretend that they have the
"only one truth" - like they did during the covid scare; there appears to be
little gaslighting and they readily admit
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20241207125224/https://www.nbcnews.com/te
ch/internet/internet-sleuths-say-wont-help-find-unitedhealthcare-ceo-suspect-rcn
a183228] (MozArchive)
that the public is not with them - But mostly, McWhorter said, “there’s this
weird thing, this vibe of like, I don’t see a bunch of people just feeling an
urgency.” (in terms of finding the culprit).
Some people - like Miles Mathis - consider this event to be staged. I don't
agree and his arguments appear quite weak. For example, it's common for the
police to release video footage to the media
(MozArchive) in hopes it
will help catch the perpetrator. And, the rich actually commonly walk around
with few or no bodyguards. Either way, it doesn't even matter. If the rulers
faked this, they are really stupid because - whether real or fake - waves of
copycats will still be thinking "oh, I could do this too". The target was not
protected by anything or anyone, and apparently the meeting information was even
public. And even though - according to a gun enthusiast I talked to - the
assassin had to be familiar with guns due to the way he performed the "tap rack
bang", the hit still looks simple enough to serve as an inspiration for
potential copycats. All that's needed is a little (or somewhat more than a
little) familiarity with guns, and a few minutes long Internet research to find
out the dates and places of corporate meetings, and you too could do something
like this. And since the gun was supposedly 3D-printed, it would even possible
to leave no paper trail in terms of receiving the murder weapon; a knife or
something else is also an option (again, the target was unprotected).
Predictably, the police is throwing the full weight (MozArchive) of
the technological slavery
system onto this
case - yet is failing to catch the culprit regardless, adding to the appeal. We
might have a true revolution brewing thanks to this incident. As even your
average normie now believes that any elite who has done too much evil is an
acceptable target for public execution, and they realize it's also not rocket
science to actually pull it off.
UPDATE: I don't trust the new "official" stuff that came out. I mean, I am
expected to believe that the killer - after performing an assassination straight
out of a Hitman game - simply decided to hang around McDonald's with the exact
gun he used at the crime scene and a bunch of fake IDs. He was smart enough to
throw away the backpack, but yet kept the murder weapon - the most incriminating
piece of evidence possible? And he had five days to get rid of it, or even flee
the country - but no, he just wanted a burger so much. Even if so, why not at
least cut your eyebrows or put on some makeup to avoid detection? Some people
think he actually wanted to be caught, but then why flee the crime scene at all?
More than that, the media want us to believe that he just happened to have (archive)
hand-written manifesto on him, containing phrases such as These parasites had it
coming. And of course all this information is coming from law enforcement
sources. Isn't that just too convenient?
I am not convinced Mangione is actually the killer. Besides the careless
behavior of the suspect after the Hitman-like assassination, there is also other
evidence he's unlikely to have done it - namely,
(MozArchive) from his
friend:
I had a two hour video-call with Mangione, the suspected UnitedHealthcare
CEO shooter, in May. He genuinely seemed like one of the nicest people I’ve
ever met. After the chat he spontaneously bought me subscriptions to
services he thought would help me with writing.
Luigi Mangione, the suspected CEO shooter, is a founding member of my
Substack, and someone I've been friendly with for a while. I hope there's
been a mix-up, because committing murder doesn't seem like him at all.
Even though his social media profiles
(local) kind of fit
someone that "might have" done the deed, it shouldn't be that hard to find a
young guy with some health problems and publicly stated grievances with the
medical system, plant some evidence on him, and make him the scapegoat. The
rulers just couldn't let this "crime" stay unsolved for too long, because again,
they need the plebs to believe that "resistance is futile". In this case,
catching someone - whoever it was - would have the same effect on perception.
Still, they are failing at narrative control this time, despite all the efforts.
Luigi Mangione - whether the real killer or not - is not only overwhelmingly
supported in his act, but also liked as a person now that his social media
profiles got revealed. He is clearly well read
(MozArchive) and
educated, and there is no indication of mental disease or extremism. Picking
Luigi as a "suspect" just buries the rulers further. If even popular right-wing
influencers are failing to convince their own audience (that usually likes "law and order") that there
was anything wrong with the assassination, you know the rulers are losing the
game.
UPDATE 2: Matt Walsh has
vomited
this piece about the assassination:
Let's cover it in depth, because I think it perfectly showcases the mindset
leading to our slavery:
If you are a conservative expressing any sympathy with leftists who are
celebrating the murder of a businessman by some mentally deranged loser then
you are not a conservative at all.
According to this reputable
dictionary (archive)
conservatism is the desire to preserve or restore what is established and to
limit change; another
one (archive)
(MozArchive) confirms
this meaning. It's important to realize that this is what drives all the Walsh
types, in the end. To him and his ilk, the current world is so amazing, that the
revolutionary must inevitably be a mentally deranged loser. If it means we have
millions of these losers, then so be it; it's not enough to make him question
if a part of the status quo might simply suck. Also, nice try at portraying the
praise for the killer as just another "delusion of the left"; it's not working
because even right-wingers are joining in. Appealing to the "victim" being a
businessman isn't working either; people are more and more catching up to the
fact that a businessman is an
exploiter - and
the more evil he does, the richer he gets. As Thompson has basically proven by
running a company with the highest rate of health insurance claim denials, and
predictably the biggest profits (archive)
We stand for law, justice, and a stable, properly ordered society.
Law is the main vehicle of
oppression, basically what
made us slaves during
the "pandemic". Justice
does not currently exist as none of the decision makers that have destroyed the
lives of millions were ever inconvenienced for it in any way - or they even got
rewarded. In fact, Thompson's death is a small step towards restoring justice
that's been missing since at least a few decades. A stable, properly ordered
society is one in which the mentally deranged revolutionaries are not allowed to
resist their oppression, lest they be stepped on and smeared against the floor.
The "proper ordering" is the one in which the pleb simply accepts his position
as the receiver of abuse, and shuts up about it and keeps fulfilling his role.
This is what the Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro types want and think is ideal.
Leftists want the opposite of all of that, which is why murder and mayhem in
the street fills these sickos with orgasmic glee.
Maybe it fills some with orgasmic glee, but I'm confident that the vast majority
has simply realized that the nonviolent ways of bringing change have all been
exhausted and proven inadequate. This assassination was something that had to be
done, and not something that they'd like to be doing. The oppression had simply
tipped the scale so much that it broke; oppression that Walsh thinks is fine
and dandy. The orgasmic glee seems like projection on Walsh's part to me; it's
probably something he feels when he imagines all those poor, sick and homeless
suffering and dying from their totally preventable diseases that the horrible
healthcare
system (and
other
parts of
his conservative utopia) at least partially contributed to. Edit: ha! Forget the
probably - Walsh has a podcast episode (MozArchive) named
Ep. 1410 - Cleaning Out The Homeless Encampments Just In Time For The Election.
Hahaha. The description contains this gem: It's about that time when guys like
Gavin Newsom temporarily pretend to care about the well-being of American
families. So, Walsh thinks that the homeless should be "cleaned out" like some
pieces of trash, and to do so is to care about the well-being of American
families. Amazing. But quite revealing about the true nature of his type. A
nature he ended up
confirming
(MozArchive) elsewhere -
Many are aggressive, violent, dangerous vagrants and the innocent people
plagued by them should earn much more of our sympathy than the vagrants
themselves. Anyway, coming back to the original tweet:
If you’re on the right and you find yourself even slightly siding with a
crazy wench like Taylor Lorenz on this issue (or any issue), it should tell
you something very troubling about yourself. It tells the rest of us
something too. We won’t forget.
I don't know who Taylor Lorenz is, so I guess I'm safe from Matt Walsh's wrath.
But it's funny, how even slightly siding with someone from another camp gets
your conservative card revoked. Is this ideology so fragile that it cannot
resist even a little questioning? I guess that is why he's getting so angry.
Maybe some cognitive dissonance had struck. After all, think about some of the
things you'd be conserving as a conservative:
Widely available junk
foods and
the resulting disease rate increases
The cruel profit-based medical
system which
gets clients because of - among others - the above
Job culture which forces you to have a job or die, which is going to get
tougher and tougher because of the ongoing robot
revolution
Advertisements constantly filling our brains with bullshit
Planned obsolescence AKA making products that break on purpose
to people buying too much because of - among others - the two points above
The money system that rewards scamming,
and allows all the points listed above to happen
Wars based on arbitrary
labels assigned to us
by our rulers at birth
at every corner of the street
The legal system standing above it all, allowing you to get punished for
anything your rulers
desire, with only
standing behind you and a prison
To finish it off, the official
ways of affecting
things that we've been given, do not
work
Of course, it's not a given that Walsh even supports all those things. But it is
likely he does for most, because I haven't seen him complain about those from a
cursory look at his Twitter and a short web search. He obviously likes
unrestricted business and so hits at least the first few points. He has spoken
in favor of surveillance in schools (archive)
(MozArchive), which
probably fit his notion of ensuring safety. And of course, he sees nothing wrong
with a couple of psychopathic rulers having the power to design "laws" that
enslave and abuse everyone else, and which the regular person has zero effect
on. That's his idea of a properly ordered society.
There is another side of conservatism that's concerned with issues like
abortion, immigration, gender issues, etc. And I'm not saying that they don't
have valid concerns there, but they are minor problems compared to surveillance,
profit motive, and the legal system - my "big three". Regardless, every issue
has to be analyzed separately; it's important to not fall into the trap of
calling yourself a "conservative" (or a "leftist", or anything else) and blindly
absorb all the positions of those groups. But that's exactly what the Walsh
types are doing and want their audiences to be doing. I believe one reason that
the assassin gained so much sympathy is because he wasn't easily shoved into
some kind of extremist box and dismissed.
People like Walsh disgust me, really. At least Gates, Schwab, Trudeau, Ardern
and other characters that reared their heads during Operation Corona were
unashamedly evil. On the other hand, this guy pretends to be the people's
champion while wanting to clean out the homeless. With the Thompson
assassination, we had the perfect revolutionary event that could have begun
toppling (some / most of) the current bullshit, and what was his reaction? How
dare you, pleb; you were supposed to stay under the boot - but look! You can set
up a Christmas tree and pretend everything is going well. This is a political
commentator that does everything in his power to pretend that the status quo is
great, and the only problem is those evil leftists trying to bring it down! In
the end, he just ends up being a gatekeeper for the rulers' regime. What a waste
of a big audience and an influential position.
Nations - the rulers' dirtiest trick
I'm sure you have heard this slogan many many times. But have you actually
considered its meaning? Its implications? Let's first cover some fundamental
issues:
What even is a "country"? Lines arbitrarily drawn on a map, signifying land
under the control of one psycho or another, then given a shiny flag and a name
so that people believe it's something unique and meaningful. And yet, whether
you put the lines here or there, the mountains or lakes between those lines have
not moved. The same people who were living there still are - and they still
have the same traits as before the map redrawing. Of course, you could say that
countries automatically form out of languages, culture, customs, ethnicities,
religions, traditions, infrastructure, etc. Yet, how much in common do you have
with someone on the other side of your country? Probably not much and your
country almost certainly has several areas where those traits all widely differ
(Poland has ones with totally different cultures, dialects, etc...yet all fly
under the same flag). Reversing this, people in different countries - such as
parts of Russia and Ukraine - can be almost identical in terms of all those
issues. Hey, a mainstream article (archive)
(MozArchive) - written by
someone living right on the fake border between those "nations" - quite
beautifully admits this for me:
Where do you call home? I’ve travelled and lived in so many places that the
question sometimes confused me.
Living on the border, the two identities often mixed, on both sides, without
much notice
But that border was nothing more than a line on a map. There was no
physical border with neighbouring Russian villages and towns, and neither
was there a linguistic or cultural one.
No linguistic or cultural difference between the Russian and Ukrainian people,
only a fake line on the map. That did not change even when psycho governments
put up a barrier right where the fake border was supposed to be:
Except they still weren’t that different. We still watched the same films,
same TV channels, we had the same celebrities, listened to the same music. I
remember how as a child I asked my dad to turn the antenna towards Russia
on Sundays in the mid-1990s to watch morning Disney cartoons in Russian.
If "countries" were actual organic things, situations like this could never
happen. What is really the point of "countries", then? Since we've
established that the "country" has no real meaning aside from the fake lines our
rulers put on the map, we have to consider other reasons why the concept might
be used. Namely, that it serves as an heavily effective propaganda tool, taking
fundamental to human brains:
In concert with these cognitive adaptations, however, human tribalism may be
rooted more deeply in a human evolutionary history in which groups provided
immense survival and reproductive benefits. Group living has afforded
benefits such as resource pooling, division of labour, cooperative
parenting, protection from predators and territorial defence.
That tribalism is indeed fundamental should not be controversial for anyone that
wasn't born yesterday. Consider how football fans will pay big money
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20240806130920/https://footballandfashion
.co.uk/1000-increase-in-football-ticket-prices-in-20-years/]
(MozArchive) to follow
their team around the country (and sometimes world) and make artistic banners
for it. They will scream at the opposing team's players all match long, throw
things at them (archive)
(MozArchive), and
sometimes even charge the stadium (archive)
(MozArchive). This is the
modern expression of tribalism, as "real" tribes basically don't exist in
civilization anymore. Yet, the brain still has that module and will find its
tribe somewhere - be it a football team or something else; if it fails to do
that, it will respond with depression (archive)
Our results showed that lower feelings of belonging at the university,
during any of the assessment periods, were predictive of more depressive
symptoms at the end of the term.
And so, a person is very strongly compelled to "belong", AKA have a tribe.
Recall the football fans again and try to imagine what you could accomplish if
you were able to control who is considered a part of someone's tribe, and who
is not. It is obvious that if someone wanted a lot of power over people, the
tribal module would be one of the best openings to pick. And the rulers are
doing just that, through the modern concept of the country. How exactly do they
take advantage of it, though?
Perhaps the main usage of nation propaganda is to justify enslaving everyone
inside the arbitrary country lines by this monster called "the law". You get
born, you get assigned a "citizenship", and right then you get wrapped in the
invisible chains around your neck called the laws of "your" nation - which you
can't see, but can feel their grip whenever they get pulled by your rulers. This
has many implications, the chief one being that you can get sent to war against
someone who was assigned a different flag at birth. The idea of "nations" is
the only one that is able to convince a regular person that her friend is her
enemy just because he was born on the other side of Dnepr river. I have to
admit I have never seen so much collective insanity as during the Ukraine war
situation - not even during Covid. When I saw all those people proudly waving
the Ukraine flags and screaming their idiotic pro-war slogans, I knew this
propaganda is attacking something very deeply ingrained in the human psychology.
Let's see some examples (archive)
(MozArchive) of this in
the media:
Ukraine urgently needs soldiers, but some men are desperate not to fight
It does? Psycho Zelensky might "need soldiers" to redraw lines on a map or
accomplish whatever other insane aims he has (like getting rid of most of the
men living there (archive)
(MozArchive) - In
particular, it is forbidden for men aged 18-60, Ukraine citizens, to leave the
borders of Ukraine) - but "Ukraine" can't "need soldiers" as countries are fake.
To say that some men are desperate not to fight assumes that fighting just
because of the arbitrary classification you've been given at birth is the
default - yet it is absolutely not. Wild tribes sometimes fight (and it is not
even a given that they would, because cooperation - or at least peaceful
coexistence - between tribes is possible), but, they fight for real things like
territory or resources. Today, we do not have to fight at all - we have food and
space and possible good life for everyone. War only helps the 0.0001% of
psychopaths who like redrawing lines and murdering whoever is unlucky enough to
find himself inside them, as well as the weapon companies who benefit
monetarily. Again, this headline is trying to redirect our natural tribalism
towards the rulers' arbitrary classifications. Do you still want to argue for
the "realness" of countries? Then check this:
Anton, 39, was working in Germany as a truck driver before the war started,
and came back to eastern Ukraine in December 2021 to see his family. After
the invasion, he found himself in Russian-occupied territory, but managed to
escape back into Europe. He is now in Ireland and says he doesn’t plan to
come back to Ukraine, either now or when the war is over.
Do you think this would happen in a real tribe? A tribe in which you'd know 100%
of the people as you'd see them every day, work with them, rely on them, trust
them with your lives? No, zero way. You'd want to save something you're attached
to and felt like fighting for it was noble, or simply necessary. And yet people
run en masse (ar
chive)
(MozArchive) (Zelensky’s
former adviser Alexey Arestovich recently claimed that 4.5 million Ukrainian
men, nearly half of the Ukrainian male population, had fled abroad to avoid
military service) in this case, because they know that the country is simply not
a tribe, and there is nothing to fight for here anyway aside from the wishes of
a psycho. Hey, let's look at what even defines a real tribe (archi
ve)
(MozArchive) and see if
we can prove it:
- 1. Common Ancestry
Tribes are often composed of individuals who share a common lineage or
descent. This shared ancestry creates a strong bond among tribe members, as
they believe they are part of a larger extended family. Kinship ties are at
the core of tribal identity, shaping social relationships and defining roles
and responsibilities within the community.
Blood relations are one of the criteria. Do you have blood relations with
99.999% of the people in your country? No. Therefore, the country fails to meet
this criteria of a tribe. Next:
- 2. Shared Culture and Traditions:
Tribes have their own unique culture, including language, customs, and
traditions that are passed down from generation to generation. These
cultural elements serve as a foundation for tribal identity and unity,
helping to preserve the tribe’s heritage and values.
Again, country doesn't fit, as there is just too much difference between various
parts of it. So another criteria failed. Next:
- 3. Territory:
Tribes often have a defined territory or homeland where they reside. This
territory provides a sense of belonging and serves as a physical space for
the tribe to maintain its way of life. The land holds spiritual and cultural
significance for tribe members, as it is tied to their history, myths, and
traditions.
Kind of fits but again, we don't really control our territory the way tribes do,
unless we're in a village or something like that. And again, the country's
definition of a territory is arbitrary, instead of something you and your tribe
see and use every day. I doubt anyone really feels a sense of belonging to an
apartment block and the street full of CCTV and ads (that's the exact same as
any other block or street), or feels they hold spiritual and cultural
significance, especially when they have no say about anything there.
- 4. Collective Decision-Making:
Tribes typically have a communal decision-making process, where important
matters are discussed and decided upon collectively. Elders and tribal
leaders play a crucial role in guiding and representing the interests of the
tribe, ensuring that decisions are made in the best interest of the
community as a whole.
- 5. Mutual Support and Cooperation:
Tribal societies heavily rely on mutual support and cooperation among their
members. The interdependence within the tribe fosters a strong sense of
solidarity, with individuals working together for the common good. Sharing
resources, knowledge, and skills are essential components of tribal life.
Another fail, as you don't even know 99.999% of the people in your country and
never will. So you can't form these kinds of relations with them. To be generous
I'll give a half point for criteria 3, and no point for the others. Therefore,
the country only fulfills 0.5 of the five criteria needed for being a tribe. It
is obviously not a tribe, yet the rulers want you to accept it as one - not
because they want to create a beautiful extended (very very extended) family,
but so that they can enslave and sacrifice you together.
Let's come back to the first article in this section. The author admits that
life became worse when the rulers started enforcing the division between Russia
and Ukraine, right on the border where he was living:
As the years passed, the border became more tangible. Suddenly, they would
check your bags and passport, and you couldn’t bring freshly a slaughtered
pig to a market in Urazovo, or your late grandma’s icon back to Dvorichna,
because there was an obstacle now, called customs
And yet, the "country" brainwashing compelled him to pick his "country
identity":
Local people naturally started to face an identity problem. So am I Russian,
or am I Ukrainian? Back then, we were like that antenna: in Ukraine, but
sometimes turning toward Russia. We didn’t see what was wrong with it.
That's because there wasn't anything wrong with it. And now you can't even move
pigs around. Why even identify with "your" country? I don't do that. The only
thing that reminds me of my "country identity" is the flag on my ID card AKA
slave card.
For us it was an actual state border, no different from the one with Poland
on the other side of the country. For the Russians it was that line on a map
drawn by Lenin. It meant nothing to them, it was an error, just like
Ukraine’s independence.
Borders are indeed an error. I mean, this guy was leading a comfortable
existence right on the fake border of Russia and Ukraine, and now he can't even
gift a pig to his friends a few kilometers away. Yet he shills the very border
that enslaves him. Absolutely insane. But it proves that the "country"
propaganda attacks something very deeply ingrained into the human brain. Finally
- since this article was written in 2023 - he had to eventually move on to the
current war (of course, all Ukraine-related articles in the mainstream media
exist only as vehicles for spreading war propaganda; this one just happens to
also provide useful information):
But the war has inevitably come to their doorstep. The middle school, where
my dad used to work, is now a shooting range and a torture facility. They
shoot people in our gymnasiums and torture them in our classrooms, they live
in our homes and eat food from our cellars, they sleep in our beds and loot
our properties.
They? You mean the Russians? AKA "people born on the other side of Dnepr who
were fed the same kind of war propaganda as you, but in reality aren't any
different"? Did you already forget the people you used to sell your pigs to? Now
you might be sent to war against those exact people, that just a while back
were a part of your real tribe, as they were right there. And suddenly, they
became a they and enemies just because the rulers (that you have zero real
relations with, and vice versa) decided to move some lines. Absolutely insane.
Just like someone is not necessarily a friend because they happened to be born
inside the same arbitrary lines as you, there is also no reason to consider
someone an enemy just because he was born inside a different set of lines (or
like here - his classification was changed). But yet, the entire nation and
war propaganda is based on this absolutely retarded idea.
Why? Because Ukrainians dared to remember who we are, dared to find our
identity. And those who were in identity limbo had to snap out of it and
finally pick a side.
Wow, this is a goldmine of country propaganda. You couldn't stick more of it in
there if you tried. You remembered who you are? Or maybe you were just told. You
suddenly found out your "identity" after however many decades? And you surely
never identified with anything other than the flag you were assigned at birth
(if so, that is very sad). You had to pick a side? If it's a side in war, maybe
pick none, as there are no winning ones - The only winning move is not to play.
It's hard for me to see how this kind of opinion can be organic.
Why can't this person (or anyone else) realize that the scam of "country
identity" is the exact thing that ignites - and then fuels - the wars? Well,
actually, he almost admits it here - but makes a wrong turn right before the
finish line and crashes his car. Because he still considers the "country
identity" as something that should be protected at all costs - even the cost of
the lives of thousands of his neighbors on the other side of Dnepr that are not
any different than him. As long as people can't give up their "country
identity", they will always be perfectly pulled by the strings set up by their
puppet masters. Because tribalism is so deeply ingrained in the human
psychology, and misdirected by the "country" propaganda.
Don't get me wrong, I don't think tribalism is evil or anything - it's just how
humans roll. The country is simply nothing like a tribe, yet the rulers pretend
that it is because the tribalism module is so fundamental. And thanks to that,
they can make the human do anything as long as he accepts his assigned "tribe" -
so don't accept it. It's not only about the Ukraine / Russia war - I just
focused on this topic as it's recent and very relevant to me; the amount of
insanity I've seen in regards to it is hard for my brain to even process. For
example (archive)
Russia wants to kill your children, your family and yourself. Do you fight?
Russia destroys the place you fled from. Russia is now attacking the place
you fled to. Do you fight?
Russia destroys most of the world. Russia is now attacking the one place
that's left, where you are hiding. Do you fight?
It's not Russia, as lines can't fight - but just some people that are very
similar to the Ukrainians but were fed the same pro-war propaganda as them. Even
(some) left wingers - that were traditionally against war - love war this
time (archiv
e)
Fuck if your going on about saving our money, why not realized that the
amount of supplies we’ve given to UA dwarfs what we spend on our military to
be ready to defeat Russia.
You want to defeat Russia? Meaning what? Destroy infrastructure, kill millions
of soldiers as well as civilians? Spread panic and instability in the ones who
manage to live? For what reason? To absorb the lines into the USA (which
presumably this person is from)? To exchange a psycho in control of the land for
another one?
Lastly, it’s morally right to support the nation that is running a DEFENSIVE
war of its nation and its peoples. I don’t wanna be on the side that
enables things like Bucha. Or Mariupol.
A defensive war does not exist. Infrastructure gets destroyed, people die, and
panic gets spread on both sides. And especially here, as psycho Zelensky is
grabbing randoms from the streets and sending them to be slaughtered like pigs.
UPDATE September 2024: wow! I was supposed to leave this topic alone
already, but can't resist sharing with you what I've just found (archive)
(MozArchive). Hold on to
your seats, I'm pretty sure we've reached the peak of warmongering here!
Russian players have always choice to renounce the citizenship of the
genocidal barbarian Russian state - not the same thing as Russia as a
country, and still be Russians of different citizenship. As long as they are
willingly citizens of a villain state, they should pay the consequences. At
this point, if Ukraine would have the capability to do it, bombing civilian
targets in Russia would be rough but very fair game. Compare the discomfort
of a regular Russian citizen being bombed at with that of these spoiled
brats not being able to compete in international competitions.
Never seen so many buzzwords in one paragraph. Genocidal, barbarian, villain -
you're supposedly these things just because you were assigned a certain flag at
birth and refused to give it up. And if you refuse to give it up, you need to
pay the consequences. It's insane to require regular people to waste time giving
up or changing the flags they have never actually picked, and also risk
retaliation of their governments; even worse to punish them for not doing so.
And of course, psycho Zelensky is not genocidal, barbarian, or a villain even
though he has decided the entirety of the under 60 male population exists only
to be sacrificed. Media tells me Russia bad, therefore Russia bad and everyone
with the relevant flag deserves to die. And wow! This guy is even fine with
bombing civilian targets. The war love is leaking through my screen! I hope it
doesn't infect me. But wow! I had to reread this a few times to be sure it
really says what it seems to. A post like this is actually what the final goal
of war propaganda is - but it's rarely reachable. Most people have enough
ethical or reasoning blocks to stop just a step or two earlier - but this is
where the rulers really want you. You've got the "wrong" flag? Here enjoy this
bomb, now burn in hell.
And so - coming back to the proudly shouted Slava Ukraine!!! slogan - it just
ends up being a call for death, instead of a call for glory (as there is no
glory to be found here). Anyway, since this war started I've seen loads of
similar posts, and obviously can't cover them all here. Many of the people
supposedly supporting Men's Rights love the "right" of men to be sent to die
in a ditch somewhere for nothing except the delusions of a psycho. Holy shit!
This shows how - again - if you convince someone to believe in a "country
identity", he's yours! And all this idiocy is based on the idea that lines do
things, while ignoring the details of it. Nation propaganda is the most vile
type of propaganda.
having absorbed their 'country identities', the above would fail completely
And yet it is used everywhere all the time since decades (and surely longer than
that) and for all kinds of reasons - because as we've established, it works
extremely well. For example, anytime there is a "crisis" of "illegal immigrants"
brings yet another opportunity for the rulers to increase their power by
pretending to be the heroes with their border walls. Yet it is nothing but a
trick to justify the ability to decide who can go when and where. I still
remember the insane situation where some immigrants were trying to come from
Belarus to Poland and the border guards just blocked them and let them freeze
to death (archive) (MozArchive). And the
justification for it was that...wait for it...they imagined Lukashenko was
waging some "hybrid attack" (archive)
(MozArchive) through
those immigrants. And thus, people died; yet, the media ran with the "border
guards are heroes" narrative and many people at Wykop ("polish reddit")
swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. Please, we need to end the cruelty of
borders and the political games played by the psychos in power to the detriment
of billions of regular people.
Since the main thesis is now finished, let's have some more fun exposing the war
propaganda in various media pieces. Hey, if they can run a propaganda campaign,
I can run a counter-propaganda one. I hope I can show you just how manipulative
the media can get, and how the manipulation can hide in some seemingly innocent
words. I'll just pick random relevant articles I have already bookmarked, then
cite some particularly revealing quotes. So let's
go (archive
)
Ukraine’s military said it had reclaimed about three square miles outside
the eastern city of Bakhmut, which would be its first significant gains
there in weeks.
Reclaimed meaning what? Lines redrawn again? And gains? Infrastructure is lost,
and people have died. The only gain is fake lines and the (probably fake too)
smile of psycho Zelensky.
The transfer came under a provision of a law enacted by Congress late last
year that authorized the Justice Department to send certain forfeited assets
to the State Department to be spent on remediating damage from Moscow’s
full-scale invasion of Ukraine last year.
The only part that matters to us is the from Moscow’s full-scale invasion of
Ukraine. It conditions you to believe the "Russia bad, Ukraine good" deeper
narrative, which is all that the rulers care about. The word invasion puts the
blame squarely on one side, and the full-scale makes it seem really really big
so that you really really hate "Russia" and are ready to blow the heads of the
Russians off. Even though they are people just like the Ukrainians, for whom the
only difference might be to have been born a few kilometers to the left and
have a different flag assigned because of it. The word Russia appears a
staggering 148 times in this article, while the word Ukraine - 78 times. Can you
guess the scores for the words human and people? It's 0 and 8. They really want
to you forget that it's people dying, in the end. Though this article has lots
of quotable quotes, let's just - to not seem like I'm cherry picking - move on
‘First results’ of counterattack praised as Ukraine’s troops claim to take
back villages in the eastern Donetsk region while Russia denies gains.
The counterattack was praised by whom? Citation needed, as Wikipedia would say
:D. Take back and gains? There is only the taking back of lines, which is no
real gain at all as long as people die and infrastructure gets destroyed.
“The enemy keeps shelling us but this won’t stop us,” Semeniuk said. “The
next village we plan to reclaim is Urozhayne. After that, [we’ll proceed]
further south.”
The enemy AKA someone who dared to be born on the other side of a fake line,
that we assigned a different flag too...and the reclaim again...this is getting
tiresome.
With so little information and scant independent reporting from the front
lines, it has been almost impossible to assess the battlefield situation.
I'll give you the independent reporting that you so crave. Infrastructure gets
destroyed, people die, and traumas accumulate in the survivors for nothing
whatsoever except the insane delusions of a few psychos. Hope that helped!
“We’re kicking the enemy out from our native lands. It’s the warmest feeling
there is. Ukraine is going to win, Ukraine above everything,” an
unidentified soldier said in the video from Blahodatne.
It's the warmest feeling to kick the enemy out. I swear, if someone was reading
this kind of trash all day every day, I can see how it would make him eventually
absorb the country propaganda and love the war that inevitably results from it.
It's such a disgusting attempt at emotional manipulation, using the tribalism
module I've mentioned before. Anyway, let's play the "country vs human" game
here, too. Ctrl+F for Russia - 25 times; Ukraine - 15; people - 2; and finally 1
for human (and only at the bottom for a link called Al Jazeera Centre for
Public Liberties & Human Rights, which seems like mockery). Let's finish with
since I'm still fired up:
Russia’s war in Ukraine has sparked a surge in demand for weapons and
vehicles, with many allies sending supplies to Ukraine to help the country
defend itself.
Again, Russia's war puts the blame squarely on one side - implying that there
even are sides in war (other than psychos vs plebs, which is more like a pyramid
structure instead of sides). And of course the standard defend itself when
there is nothing to defend but lines, and nothing gained from doing so but the
death, despair and destruction that the rulers certainly love.
Inflatech CEO Vojtech Fresser won't say if his decoys are used by Ukrainian
forces battling Russian invaders, but he said on Monday that his business
was up by more than 30 per cent last year.
Russian invaders aka "Russia bad" and everyone with that flag assigned at birth
is fine to get sacrificed.
“If I force the enemy to destroy a thing of mine by using something which is
four times, but in reality it could be 20 times more expensive, then I’m
the winner economically,” Fresser said.
No; you (or rather we - the plebs) are all losers economically as this money
could be more usefully spent on the homeless, or even researching the
reproductive cycles of ladybugs (and there is a lot of it wasted here - The
decoys that originally were developed for training purposes can cost up to
$100,000 (€93,795) each).
Please take note of how all mainstream Ukraine articles (and there are hundreds
maybe thousands by now - that follow the same script) accept certain deeper
narratives as given. War is needed, war is acceptable; there is a good side and
bad side - ally and enemy - and the enemy must die; lines are real things with
physical effects; death, despair and destruction don't matter as long as the
"right" side wins; to fight for your line is noble and the most important thing
ever. Details might change, but the fundamentals are always the same. I hope I
have helped you to recognize the rulers' war propaganda and manage to resist it
now.
UPDATE June 2025: two guys on scooters just raided a UK military base,
destroyed two planes, and left without being caught (archive)
(MozArchive). Quite an
artistic way to inhibit the war machine:
The bodycam footage then shows them spraying red paint into the turbine
engines of the air-to-air refuelling tankers which the RAF say are 'vital
for enhancing the operational reach and flexibility of Britain's military
air power'.
Palestine Action claim to have used repurposed fire extinguishers to spray
the paint, while they say they caused further damage with crowbars.
I haven't heard of this group before this incident, but it turns out they've
performed other similar ones
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20250427124909/https://palestineaction.or
g/tamworth-shutdown/]
(MozArchive) before. I
think this is a good first step towards bringing down the war machine. But it
needs to not just be "Palestine Action" but "Anti-war Action" and happen all
over the world. There is of course a tiny little problem - namely that the war
machine doesn't mind labeling the activists as "terrorists" (archive)
(MozArchive), sending
Kapos to arrest them and continuing the massacres. So eventually, the activists
will need to resist the Kapos too - which at the moment, they don't, as far as I
can see. They hope to rely on the court system to provide justice which it of
course won't. Still,
this is the most promising instance of activism I know of that's going on right
now. I hope it will teach people they don't need to sit meekly by, while their
rulers execute decisions they don't agree with, and create copycats everywhere.
But since currently, the war machine is free to just imprison us all in the
building, the activism can't end there. At some point, we'll need to bring down
the entire system of surveillance, prisons, media brainwashing, and finally the
giant totalitarian states that enable it all. Then replace them with small
communities with direct
democracy.
The false hope of the United Nations
I looked briefly at their Universal declaration of human
rights (
archive)
(MozArchive), which
presents various beautiful statements that they then end up breaking. I will now
attempt to show how they are doing just that:
Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this
Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made
on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the
country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent,
trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.
Keep in mind the bolded part, because it will be relevant to almost every UN
article that I'm going to bring up.
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
Except the hundreds of thousands of men dragged to trucks (archive
)
(MozArchive) by
psychopath Zelensky and thrown into a ditch to die?
No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade
shall be prohibited in all their forms.
Conscription is slavery and exists in many countries, about which the UN does
nothing whatsoever.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment.
Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national
tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the
constitution or by law.
So in theory Zelensky could be brought before the courts for his mass sacrifice
of men. But he isn't being, because the UN are Zelensky worshippers.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
Zelensky is arbitrarily grabbing men from everywhere he can find them, throwing
them into trucks, and sending to a ditch to die.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an
independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and
obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
What did the UN do to give hearing to the people whose rights to life, liberty
and security Zelensky had violated?
Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the
borders of each state.
Zelensky broke that by dragging men to trucks.
Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to
return to his country.
Hahaha. This almost sounds like mockery when you notice how Zelensky breaks
every UN article like it was nothing. Maybe he actually wanted to become the
world's biggest villain, and went through all of the statements in order to do
the opposite.
Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from
persecution.
You should know what I'm going to say here. By not letting men leave, Zelensky
is violating their right to seek asylum.
Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right
includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive
and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of
frontiers.
I apologize for having to stop the Zelensky beatdown, but pretty much the entire
world now breaks this with censorship against Russian propaganda, alternative
Covid narratives, etc. The UN - of course - does nothing about it.
Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country,
directly or through freely chosen representatives.
Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is
entitled to realization, through national effort and international
co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each
State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his
dignity and the free development of his personality.
Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration
ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity,
and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.
Obviously this does not exist. Businesses will pay workers the lowest possible
amount (archive)
(MozArchive) that
still keeps them there. Human dignity doesn't matter as long as there are
homeless people, people in abusive relationships from which they cannot escape,
sick people still forced to work, etc. Also, this is discriminatory against
anyone who can't or shouldn't work (eg. the chronically ill, full-time parents,
war trauma victims, etc) and perpetuates the mindset of worshipping the false
god of
productivity.
Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation
of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.
The job culture is already not reasonable, since we do so much
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20220831085507/https://theanarchistlibrar
y.org/library/david-graeber-bullshit-jobs]
(MozArchive) and /
or
stuff. Automation is now
wrecking even that
(already compromised pre-AI) "job market", but the UN isn't going to react,
because they are obessed with the jungle mindset and having everyone "earn a
living".
Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and
well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing
and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in
the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or
other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.
This seems like mockery. The sick are famously treated like junk, having to
provide their entire medical and life histories, submit to interrogations, fill
out forms, and wait in hopes the government graciously vomits out some crumbs
(which will only happen if you're halfway dead already) so that they can
(barely) stay alive. And then the sick person still has to be constantly worried
she's going to get left on ice at some point, as the checkups are ongoing
(gotta make sure the sick junk isn't "unjustly" receiving the scraps because
Zelensky's delusions absolutely cannot spare any of his billions). This doesn't
even consider all the other ways in which the sick are discriminated. The entire
world is set up only for the healthy, starting from school which teaches the
sick they are total junk
and with nothing else in society to reverse that, they often remain with that
conviction for the rest of their lives. In this extremely individual and
competitive "civilization" (that's not actually civilized at all), no matter how
sick you are, you are expected to "take care of yourself" (AKA fulfill the
requirements of the healthy) - and if you can't, that's more begging that isn't
even sure to accomplish anything. Letting a sick person leave her abusive family
isn't a priority for example, and probably won't happen at all, all while there
they are simply meant for either the Ukrainian refugees (whom psychopath
Zelensky had displaced), or "young families" or simply rich businessmen for
renting. If the sick were actually important, they would be able to leave their
unacceptable situations, enter the new one, and that would be that - without any
of the bullying executed by way of
bureaucracy that's not actually
accomplishing anything useful - but does provide a mildly effective cover for
the discrimination. But as it currently is, as a sick person, you are reminded
of how worthless you are every single second of your life and the UN (as well as
everyone else) is doing absolutely nothing to change it.
Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in
the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be
compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally
available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the
basis of merit.
Heh. Of course the UN loves school.
Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality
and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental
freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all
nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of
the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.
Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be
given to their children.
What about the students?
Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the
community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its
benefits.
Too bad we live in a world in which inventions that could help the entire
humanity are appropriated by
businesses and gatekept
by giant
paywalls or
other criteria (such as taking the Covid vaccine).
Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests
resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he
is the author.
Oh, so inventions aren't to be "shared" anymore - only to exist for personal
profit. Noted.
Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights
and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.
Obviously we lack this "order", and as you'll see later, it's absolutely by
design. Hey, let's now see what the UN thinks specifically about the Ukraine
war (arch
ive)
(MozArchive) (though I'm
sure you can imagine it already):
On the night of 23 to 24 February 2022, Russia launched a military offensive
in Ukraine. The United Nations considers this attack to be a violation of
the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine. It is contrary to the
principles of the Charter of the United Nations.
Of course, it's the standard Western narrative of insane Putin just "deciding to
invade" without any preceding factors. But okay, let's run with it because it
doesn't really make anything better. I mean, are territorial integrity and
sovereignty of Ukraine (which doesn't exist anyway, as the Covid response -
for example - showed) more
important that the millions of lives lost? Anyway, let's read further for the
proof of how the UN is also a malicious organization:
On Thursday 24 March, the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly demanded
civilian protection and humanitarian access in Ukraine, while also
criticizing Russia for creating a “dire” humanitarian situation (140 votes
in favour, 5 against and 38 abstentions).
Civilian protection? Does that include the civilians dragged to the frontline by
Zelensky?
The United Nations Coordinator for Ukraine estimated on the 100th day of the
Russian invasion of Ukraine that the war will have no winner.
Heh. I think this is the only sane thing said in this entire report. But if
there can be no winner, why isn't the UN tackling the actual factors leading to
wars - such as borders, media propaganda, government warmongering, military
companies being able to freely create weapons and derive profit from the
destruction, etc?
On 29 September, UN Secretary-General António Guterres said that Russia’s
plan to annex four occupied regions in Ukraine would be an illegal move, a
violation of international law, and should be condemned.
Does this even matter? Have the plebeians been asked which state they'd rather
live under? It's another instance of country propaganda that helps no one. The
UN seems to worry more about lines on the map than the actual state of things.
On 14 November, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution that calls for
Russia to pay war reparations to Ukraine, as ambassadors met to resume their
emergency special session devoted to the conflict. Ninety-four countries
voted in favour of the resolution, and 14 against, while 73 abstained
Again, one "side" is bad while the other is "good" but the lives lost don't
matter. And the "reparations" would only reach the stateheads, who'd then decide
what to do with them, and not the
plebeians.
The UN Disarmament Affairs (UNODA) chief, Izumi Nakamitsu, briefed the
Security Council on the issue of “supplies of lethal weapons to Ukraine and
their consequences”.
Oh! Finally something that seems interesting. Yet I've looked at the document
(local) and saw nothing whatsoever
condemning the European suppliers of weapons to Ukraine, despite that directly
contributing to continuing the war. All they could muster was - I also urge
States to apply effective arms control measures to address the risks related to
arms transfers. I want to reiterate: preventing diversion of supplied weapons
and ammunition is essential to avoid fueling conflict and insecurity in the
region and beyond - but that's just complaining about the weapons being possibly
diverted, instead of being used wrong by the "officially approved people". It
seems the UN doesn't care about the destruction being done after all.
Speaking in Kyiv on 15 December 2022, at the end of a four-day official
visit, Martin Griffiths described the deadly threat from daily artillery
attacks on the southern port city of Kherson. More than 18 million people in
Ukraine need humanitarian aid, some 7.83 million have fled the country and
6.5 million are internally displaced.
Why not mention that psychopath Zelensky is blocking the fleeing and actually
makes Ukraine's male citizens fight for their lives without the ability escape
the game? Isn't this something that should matter to the UN, if they care about
the "right to life"?
On 16 January 2023, the Secretary-General strongly condemned a deadly
missile strike on a residential building in the city of Dnipro, Ukraine, in
which at least 40 people were killed, with many more wounded and dozens
missing.
I'm not denying this, nor its importance, but it's nothing compared to the
amount of people Zelensky had sacrificed so far (by - again - not letting them
leave and treating every male as a potential conscript). Yet not a peep can be
heard from the UN about that. Do they actually care about ending the suffering,
instead of propping up the Western narrative?
On 10 March, UN-appointed independent human rights experts said they were
“deeply disturbed” by reports of the systematic recruitment of prisoners
across Russia by the private military contractor known as the Wagner Group,
which is playing a major role in the fighting in Ukraine.
Yet they are not deeply disturbed by the dragging of innocent men from bars to
the trucks which then go to the frontline? I'm already tired of this, it's
obvious the UN isn't what they pretend to be.
On 17 March, the Pre-Trial Chamber of the UN-backed International Criminal
Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for President Vladimir Putin of Russia,
in connection with alleged war crimes concerning the deportation and
“illegal transfer” of children from occupied Ukraine.
Once you're there, why not drag Zelensky before the court as well,
for...everything I've already mentioned, that you've been completely ignoring?
Nearly $7 billion will be required over the next decade to rebuild the
cultural sector in war-ravaged Ukraine, the head of the UN Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Audrey Azoulay, said during a
visit to the country.
This is nothing compared to what's been spent on weapons for Ukraine. It
shouldn't be a problem to have the military companies fund the bill, right?
The Russian invasion of Ukraine reached the 500-day mark on Friday, 7 July
2023. The UN’s Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) has
confirmed that more than 9,000 civilians, including over 500 children, have
been killed since then, though the real number could be much higher.
Actually it's a lot more than that, because those innocent men dragged to trucks
were civilians before getting sent to the frontline. But because it's Zelensky
who's the perpetrator and breaks their entire narrative, this is being ignored.
On 5 October, the small village of Hroza in the Kupiansk district of
Ukraine’s Kharkiv region suffered one of the deadliest attacks on civilians
since the beginning of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February
of last year. At least 52 people were reportedly killed when a missile hit a
shop and café.
RIP to those 52 people. But what about the hundreds of thousands sacrificed by
Zelensky? Isn't the UN being just a little biased here?
The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine documented
further evidence that Russian authorities have committed indiscriminate
attacks and the war crimes of torture, rape and other sexual violence, and
deportation of children to the Russian Federation, according to its report
submitted to the UN General Assembly.
What about the authority of Zelensky who had ordered the mass sacrifice of
Ukrainian men without giving them the ability to avoid it (AKA leave the
country)? Not even Putin blocked emigrations entirely, as far as I know. And
remember, according to the UN, the human rights are without distinction. Meaning
the fact that Ukraine is at war doesn't matter at all. So why isn't Zelensky
getting dragged to courts for his human rights violations, just like Putin was
(he didn't come, of course, but at least there was an attempt)?
On 29 December 2023, the UN Secretary-General condemned in the strongest
terms a massive aerial attack by Russia on Ukrainian towns and cities, which
left at least 30 civilians dead and over 160 injured. Major aerial attacks
causing widespread death and destruction of homes and civilian
infrastructure have rained down on Ukraine in the first days of 2024 due to
an intense new Russian offensive.
Why is the UN not reacting to the Ukrainian military doing the same (archive)
(MozArchive)? Maybe they
don't care about the civilian deaths actually, but only spreading the Western
narrative?
Reconstruction and recovery in war-torn Ukraine is projected to cost $486
billion over the next decade, up from $411 billion estimated a year ago. The
updated Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment (RDNA3) – issued by Ukraine’s
Government, alongside the World Bank Group, the European Commission and the
UN – covers damage incurred since the start of the full-scale Russian
invasion on 24 February 2022 to the end of last December.
Why is "Russia" the only guilty party, instead of the Ukrainian government (who
did not attempt a peace deal since that one Boris Johnson prevented), the other
European governments as well as USA who kept sending weapons (archive)
(MozArchive), etc? It
doesn't really seem that the UN is concerned with the damage done by the war,
only about supporting Western power interests.
On 15 March, the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine
published a report on the situation in the country two years after the
full-scale invasion of Ukraine by the Russian Federation. The Commission has
found new evidence that Russian authorities have committed violations of
international human rights and international humanitarian law and
corresponding war crimes in areas that came under their control in Ukraine.
It's too bad that they still cannot find the several massive violations of human
rights by their hero Zelensky.
The UN sexual and reproductive health agency, UNFPA highlighted that a
deepening demographic crisis is roiling Ukraine, exacerbated by Russia’s
full-scale invasion. The number of Ukrainian refugees has now reached 6.7
million and, since Russia’s invasion in 2014, Ukraine’s population has
declined by over 10 million.
Isn't it also exacerbated by Zelensky's mass male sacrifice? Let's be clear
about what all those men are actually fleeing from. Also, there is a
"demographic crisis" everywhere today, because of the horrible conditions which
we've found ourselves in during the last few decades.
19 November 2024 marked 1,000 days days since the start of the full-scale
invasion of the armed forces of the Russian Federation. UN Resident and
Humanitarian Coordinator in Ukraine Matthias Schmale urged the international
community to stand with the people of Ukraine.
That would require standing against Zelensky who is sacrificing them. But of
course, that is not what they mean.
On 8 January 2025, in an update mandated by the Council in Geneva, Nada
Al-Nashif, UN Deputy High Commissioner for Human Rights said that Russian
forces continue to subject Ukraine’s people to “relentless attacks” by
aerial glide bombs, long-range missiles and drones. These attacks had led to
the deaths of 574 civilians – an increase of 30 per cent over the previous
year.
That's horrible. But you did nothing to actually stop the war.
In the fourth year of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, housing
remains one of the country’s most urgent humanitarian and recovery
challenges. As relentless attacks continue to damage homes and communities
across Ukraine, the UN refugee agency (UNHCR) has now helped repair over
40,000 war-damaged homes.
Cool, but it doesn't really fix the core problems. Only ending war as an
institution, actually would. But that is not what the UN wants. They still
support borders and
flags. They don't mind
conscription and throwing innocent men into the butchery. They are also fine
with mass weapon production and the giant sums of money spent on it by
governments. I wonder if the UN has any power at all? If so, why are they not
using it for anything actually meaningful? They could tell governments to stop
funding wars, to stop conscription. They could force Zelensky to let men leave
the country if they don't want to defend it. Maybe even disband the weapon
producers. But none of that is happening. Either they are a paper tiger or
simply another controlled opposition to make you believe that there is truly a
just order governing the world. Even their name is a fraud, since they don't
care about truly "uniting" the nations (which would require trying to find a
path to peace, instead of screaming how bad one of the "sides" is).
I don't think the UN's existence is negative in principle. I mean, to
prevent the abuse of power by states, you either need the people themselves to
rise up against them (which is extremely unlikely considering how cucked the
populace has gotten, and how many systems to prevent the uprising the states
have set up), or something above the states that they have to answer to (this is
the UN). The problem is that the UN isn't fulfilling any of its obligations. At
first, I wanted to call them a "paper tiger" in the title, but then I realized
the actual situation is worse than that. They are actively violating their own
stated principles just so they can advance Western state interests.
The UN - and the Western media and politics in general - present a cartoonish
view of reality. In it, Vladimir Putin is the ultimate villain and everything he
does is automatically evil because he is pure evil personified. And, anyone
that stands up to him is automatically a hero regardless of the actual effects
of what he is doing. If you convince people of this, you can get them to accept
and do anything. The strategy of scapegoat states is currently being used to
(MozArchive) in certain
Euro countries, kill internet anonymity - and implement censorship - in the
entire Europe, was used
in the USA for the Patriot
Act (archive)
(MozArchive), and surely
many other times. But in this reality, there is truly no fight between heroic
or villainous states; only a group of people vying for more power - and trying
to get you to jump onto their train by telling you they are the good guys while
the enemy state is "bad". Even though in the end, you gain nothing out of it,
and neither do the citizens of the "enemy" state. Once we evolve past the power
games of the ruling psychopaths, we can imagine (and start working towards) a
world without wars, borders (what actually enables wars), slavery, torture,
abuse, fearmongering, mass surveillance, starvation, disease. And as the UN
would rather have us believing in cartoons, they are just another obstacle to
this world.
Zelensky lied, people died
Three days ago this has dropped
(MozArchive) for the
first time on English-language sites, I think. I posted it on the MUC then, but
it was denied - yet I could sense a big breakthrough brewing. Anyway, the
article said that Russian hacker group KillNet confirmed that they managed to
breach the database of the Ukrainian General Staff and they claimed that Ukraine
has lost over 1.7 million servicemen since the start of the special military
operation. Almost instantly, the entirety of Zelensky-controlled western media
(there are so many articles with the exact same words in different outlets)
(MozArchive) to dismiss
the revelations as fake news and Russian propaganda. Their "reasoning" was this:
“Kremlin-controlled propaganda outlets are spreading claims that Russian
hackers allegedly breached the General Staff’s database and obtained
information about ‘1.7 million dead and missing Ukrainian soldiers’ since
Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. In reality, this is an utterly
absurd fake, as Ukraine has never had a standing army of 1.7 million
personnel throughout its independence,” the statement reads.
Did you forget that psycho Zelensky has been sending trucks all over Ukraine and
picking up random men to unload them into a ditch to die? With that in mind,
every man under 60 is a possible military serviceman, and would fit inside
the stats. Suddenly, there is no problem since 1.7 million is less than 10% of
Ukrainian men - very realistic for a 3 year long war. And remember, this isn't
even talking about deaths, but missing soldiers which might have become
independent from the Kremlin are picking this up (archive)
(MozArchive), it seems
that it is indeed valid.
(MozArchive) has just a
little under 160k deaths catalogued - all with faces and names (it is truly
horrifying to imagine, that every one of those people had his own story; hobbies
and occupations; hopes and dreams; friends and families - and now all that
remains is a tombstone with "I died for psycho Zelensky's delusions" engraved on
it; assuming they even got that). And that will be an extreme underestimate
announcements by local authorities, Ukrainian media, posts by relatives on
social media, monuments to the dead. Therefore, deaths could easily be buried by
the government simply not talking about them, as long as they had no family
that cared about them. The website admits this: As only data that is available
online is considered, the real level of losses is estimated to be considerably
higher. In particular, available data is scarce for large cities,
Transcarpathia, and most localities in the east and south; as a result, the
casualties listed here are likely only a fraction of the real toll. But what
does it all mean?
Zelensky lied, people died. In February he had attempted to fool everyone
with the 45000 dead soldiers figure (archive)
(MozArchive), while we
now know that - even under the assumption that only a million of the "missing in
action" soldiers are actually dead - he's missed the mark by a factor of 22.
And - in the worst possible case that the hack was entirely faked - the
independent war tracking site confirms at least an almost 4x underestimation
(but certainly more due to their own underestimation). Of course, it's
impossible that his data collection was so bad that all the corpses just slipped
through, therefore this was done very deliberately (similar to the fakery of
COVID vaccine deaths).
He knew very well that he's not "winning", he knew very well of the mass
sacrifice going on. Yet he kept puffing his chest in the media, kept begging for
weapons from Europe and USA, kept avoiding peaceful resolutions, kept picking
up innocent Ukrainian males by the trucks. And his swarm of dick-suckers in the
EU kept enabling him for all this time, kept spreading his lies throughout the
media of various countries, kept robbing their own citizens just to fuel
Zelensky's narcisstic delusions. All these psychopaths need to be immediately
removed from power and punished for their war crimes, but they will never be
because of...the entire theme of this article. At least, not by the "usually
accepted" means.
And what's going to be the ending of all this? One way or another the psycho is
going to have to make concessions to Putin, so why did he not do it right at the
beginning? Of course, because he's a psycho, such ideas don't come to him
(edit: an additional
reason has just turned
up). His psychology doesn't ever allow him to be "wrong" or a loser. Millions of
corpses and leveled cities be damned; let's just sacrifice more Ukrainians and
pretend we're not running out of them so that Putin gets scared and disappears.
This is the level of delusional narcissism that Zelensky suffers from; I bet
some psychoanalyst guy would have real fun with this specimen. And such
characters somehow end up in the highest positions of power, while the vast
majority of people live like nothing's going on. What a disaster.
The states' interests != your interests
The Ukraine war plot thickened when I came across this
document (archive)
(MozArchive) (which has
somehow eluded me for the entire duration of the insanity) that appears to
indict another villain as the mastermind behind the last 3 years. Can you guess
who it is? Boris Johnson, who met up with Zelensky and brought him these
messages (or maybe orders?):
The first is that Putin is a war criminal, he should be pressured, not
negotiated with.
And the second is that even if Ukraine is ready to sign some agreements on
guarantees with Putin, they are not.
So basically, Ukraine was close to an agreement with Russia that would have
nipped the future destruction in the bud. But that is not what the villain
wanted. He saw an opportunity to bury Putin and Russia and decided he'd do
everything to bring it to fruition:
Johnson’s position was that the collective West, which back in February had
suggested Zelenskyy should surrender and flee, now felt that Putin was not
really as powerful as they had previously imagined, and that here was a
chance to "press him."
Boom! Peace suddenly stopped being an aim in favor of "pressing Putin". Now
let's consider what were the results of this "pressing":
The giant number of deaths (on both "sides") has already been mentioned.
Yet, that doesn't even consider the millions who have been
displaced (archiv
e)
(MozArchive) from their
home country. They will have to deal with foreign cultures, possible
unsympathetic governments, language barriers, loss of their friends and
families, difficulty in finding jobs, etc.
(MozArchive) to
unprecedented levels - Natural gas prices in Europe hit an all-time high of
€350 per megawatt-hour in August 2022, compared to an average of €20 in 2020.;
Nickel is crucial for stainless steel and EV battery production. The price
surge raised battery costs by 30%, affecting electric vehicle manufacturers.
If you live in Russia, you cannot
buy (archive)
(MozArchive) certain
products anymore - Hundreds of major firms, including McDonald's, Coca-Cola,
Starbucks and Heineken, have stopped selling and making goods in Russia.
Conscription (military slavery, preparation for male sacrifice in war) has
been brought
back (
archive) (MozArchive) in
certain countries.
Innocent sports players, who had nothing to do with Putin's decisions, were
(MozArchive) from
sports tournaments, just because of "bad Russian flag" assigned at birth.
Journalists criticizing the Ukrainian state got imprisoned (archive)
(MozArchive) to die in
there from medical neglect with no contact from their lawyers or family for
months (total lawlessness while we supposedly live in countries governed by
the "rule of law"...) - I cannot accept the way my son has died. He was
tortured, extorted, incommunicado for 8 months and 11 days and the US Embassy
did nothing to help my son,” Lira Sr. stated in an email announcing the news.
Dystopian laws against
journalists have
recently been unleashed by the EU. One of the justifications for those is
combatting Russian propaganda.
Countries have had to nuke their welfare systems
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20250825110204/https://sputnikglobe.com
/20250825/germany-can-no-longer-fund-its-welfare-system---merz-1122670956.html
] (MozArchive) just so
they could continue to support Ukraine (AKA fund their weapons).
Can anyone honestly say that that early peace agreement would have been worse
than whatever followed? So why didn't it happen? Again - Johnson, Zelensky, and
all the others simply prefered to challenge Putin in the modern power game, than
attempt a peaceful resolution. And of course, once he was "pressed", he had to
press back. At that point, the Western side couldn't give up because it would
just make them look cowardly and wasteful, so they kept "pressing". Their own
propaganda in which Putin was trying to conquer the world and had to be stopped
at all costs buried them. Basically they sunkcosted themselves into a hole so
deep they couldn't climb out of it anymore. But why did they not simply go for
the peace deal originally? I can't say that exactly. There are many ideas out
there - for example to increase the West's cultural, legal, or military
influence. The core of my thesis, though, works just as well if it's "insane
dictator Putin" who just wants to attack places for the lulz, and "invasion
victim Ukraine" simply wanting to "defend itself" (this idea has been
(MozArchive), by the
way). In all of those scenarios, it's the common man (again, from both "sides"
and even elsewhere in the world) who ends up absorbing the harm, while the
puppet masters sit in their golden offices (archive)
(MozArchive) and will
never be affected by their own shitty policies. If push comes to shove, they
(MozArchive)), and keep
enjoying their comfortable life completely separated from the effects their
decisions brought onto the plebeians.
The biggest issue here is equating the state's aims with yours. And the
point of war propaganda is to equalize those in your mind (read the section
Nations - the rulers' dirtiest
trick for a refresher on
how they do it). But it is obvious they are not only not equal, but very far
away and perhaps even exactly opposite. The Ukraine war proves it very well. For
example, David Cameron (archive)
(MozArchive) (yes, the
psycho who wanted to ban
encryption a
decade ago) proposed funding the war so that Russia would waste its weapon
supplies, increasing USA military and political power - Perhaps for about five
or 10% of your defence budget, almost half of Russia’s pre-war military
equipment has been destroyed without the loss of a single American life (but
what about other lives?). This is an investment in United States security. And
I'm sure I could compile a similar "list of sins" aimed at Putin's regime, but
that would be falling into the exact trap I'm trying to warn of - "which state
is less bad / justified in its transgressions?". Also, if you're reading this,
presumably you're from a Western country and might be believing the ideas
popular there, to which I wanted to provide a counter. Regardless, we should
leave the squabbling to the states and their propaganda outlets, while directing
our focus to the battle against the entire idea of
war.
Polish government - the peak of psychopathy
Yes, the unthinkable has happened, and a government more psychopathic than
Zelensky's has turned up right under my nose. Somehow this has eluded me so far,
and it seems everyone else too as it has not been internationally reported. So
"W przypadku wojny powołanie może otrzymać każdy polski obywatel pomiędzy
18. a 60. rokiem życia. Bez względu na kraj zamieszkania i rezydencję
podatkową. Wyjątkami są osoby, którym na służbę nie pozwala stan zdrowia,
kobiety w ciąży lub opiekujące się dziećmi, osoby, których kwalifikacje lub
zajmowane stanowiska są niezbędne dla zapewnienia obrony i bezpieczeństwa
państwa, a także ci, którzy posiadają drugie obywatelstwo"
Translation:
In case of war, every polish citizen between age 18 and 60 might get
mobilized. Regardless of where he lives and pays taxes. The exceptions are
people whose health situation doesn't allow them to serve, women who are
pregnant or taking care of kids, dual citizens, as well as people whose
qualifications or positions are necessary for the defense and security of
the state.
Did you notice anything interesting in the above paragraph? It's not only men
who will get dragged to war this time, as is usually (always?) the case. In
fact, the only women who will avoid this fate are the pregnant ones, or
mothers of young kids. Therefore all the single women, or ones with adult
kids, will get added to the sacrifice pile. Wow! Even Zelensky didn't sink so
low as to draft women, despite already losing over a million Ukrainian soldiers
and scrambling. I think it's the first time I've ever seen something like this
even be attempted.
Supposedly these modifications came in on January 2025. I won't bother reading
the actual legal documents as they are extremely long and I can't find the
relevant parts, so I'll just trust the media reporting. And I have no reason to
disbelieve this anyway because the polish government is full of bloodthirsty
psychopaths. During the last few months, the media is clearly attempting to push
for the war with Russia. Some recent headlines from various Polish media sites:
Polscy spadochroniarze wylądowali w Szwecji. „Jasny sygnał dla wroga” / Polish paratroopers landed in Sweden. Clear signal to the
enemy (Russia)
Rosyjskie myśliwce nad Polską? „Odpowiemy jak trzeba” / Russian jets over Polish territory? "We will answer
appropriately"
Rosyjskie samoloty nad niemieckim okrętem. Zakłóciły manewry NATO / Russian planes over German ship. Interrupted NATO
maneuvers.
"Rosja przekroczyła czerwoną linię". Ekspert nie ma wątpliwości / "Russia crossed the red line". This expert has no doubts
Sikorski wprost do władz Rosji. "Zostaliście ostrzeżeni" / Sikorski (polish Minister of Foreign Affairs) straight to Russia's
rulers. "You have been warned"
Polskie Wojsko poderwało myśliwce. "Stan najwyższej gotowości" / Polish Army raised fighter jets. "The state of highest
preparedness"
Rosyjskie MiG-31 nad Estonią. Zełenski apeluje o "zdecydowane działania" / Russian MiG-31 over Estonian
territory. Zelensky pleads for "a decisive response"
Generał wprost o działaniach Rosji. "Powinniśmy zestrzeliwać rosyjskie samol
oty" / General talks straight about
Russia's actions. "We should be shooting down russian planes"
And that over and over, every single day, since the beginning of the conflict.
Recently the push for Poland's war with Russia became particularly blatant,
thanks to the supposed airspace violations by the latter. Let's use our brains:
why would Russia want to provoke a bunch of countries (Sweden, Germany, Denmark,
Estonia, and Poland have been suggested so far), so that those would now have a
justification to attack? It would be insane to expect to win against all those
together. So why invite that? Maybe...they actually didn't, and the supposed
violations either did not happen at all or were false flags? Actually, we do
have proof (archive) (MozArchive) of that
for at least one of them - the supposed drone attack on Poland:
A widely circulated photo of the destruction of a house in Poland, allegedly
damaged by a Russian drone strike, is refuted by local residents, who note
that this house was heavily damaged during a storm two months ago and its
condition has not changed since then. – FRWL
If you are into conspiracies, you will recognize this as yet another instance of
the very common strategy of using old footage to prop up their new propaganda
claims. Naturally I assume all the other incidents are also BS, but I can't be
bothered to be hunting down proofs. Since I already know what the government and
its hired media goons are trying to accomplish (sacrifice all Poles in the war
with Russia), there's no need for me to try to expose every single part of their
scheme separately. At this point I think the war with Russia is more likely
than not to proceed, though I hope someone or something appears that prevents it
- yet I have no idea what that could be. They are already attempting to brain
wash (archive)
(MozArchive) every adult
male into accepting their deaths in some ditch.
Jaroslaw Kaczyński, the head of Poland’s largest opposition party, the
conservative Law and Justice, said a mental shift in society would also be
needed in addition to the military training of men. “We will have a return
to the chivalric ethos and to the fact that men should also be soldiers,
that is, be able to expose themselves, even to death,” Kaczyński said.
Welcome to conservative brainrot. Anyway - coming back to the female drafting
attempts - I would have expected at least some feminist organizations to have
covered this, but apparently they didn't. Maybe they will when the sacrifice
actually begins. Either way, this shows that the psychos in charge have absolute
zero limits to their cruelty, so don't assume you'll be spared because you're
apart of this or that supposedly marginalized group (they didn't care about that
when they executed their vaccine
extermination, remember).
Again, it's time to accept that all these squabbles at the top level are not
benefitting you at all and you are just a mook to get sacrificed. If you do so,
then revolting
reveals itself as the only sane response.
Toppling the law is all that matters
This is my final conclusion from basically all my researching, writing,
analyzing and re-analyzing, re-researching and rewriting. Wherever I go, I
always end up in the same place. Meaning, I can't anymore resist the thought
that it doesn't really matter what you believe about:
Ukraine war or any war, draft, conscription
The schooling system
The money system, capitalism, taxes...
Gun rights
COVID and the response to it
Racism, sexism, feminism, DEI, etc...
Transgenderism
Abortion
Immigration
Surveillance
Climate change
Free speech
Luigi Mangione
Vaccine safety
GM food safety
And all kinds of other stuff people constantly fight about. But why is that?
Simple - you don't decide either way, the rulers do. Yet they really want
you to believe that what you think matters. But why is that? Because in that
case, you will blame the world's problems on another group of plebeians,
instead of the rulers. And I know that this is going on in the wild, because
I've studied all kinds of communities, and I've seen it happen everywhere. The
(MozArchive), the
lockdown hater will blame the
"Covidian" (archive)
(MozArchive), the white
nationalist will blame the black or Indian, etc. Even people at places like
LateStageCapitalism, who are very well aware of this strategy, still keep
falling for it. They will tell you the exact same thing I have
here (
archive)
(MozArchive), only to
jump down the throat of the "TERF", "racist", "fascist", or celebrate the
death of a
neo-Nazi (archive)
(MozArchive) a minute
later. Obviously, right wing places (or any other places) are not doing any
better, except the targets change to "socialists", "commies", the "woke", the
"trannies", etc...
Let's make it clear. What power do any of those groups have? None. Where does
power come from currently? THE FUCKING LAW. And where does the law come
from? From the minds and pens of the rulers - and they are not inviting the
white nationalist, TERF or commie for "peer review". So why does everyone
pretend that what the plebeian thinks or writes matters? After all, that's the
implicit assumption in all political grievances, debates, etc. I swear, I'd love
it if reality worked the way some of those people think. If the average
screaming TikTok feminist could actually affect how anything works, then it
means that I - theoretically - could, too. But it is an illusion, and the
citizen cannot affect anything at all. His power is limited to whining about the
"woke" or "Nazis" on social media (if he is not censored for it, that is).
If this is hard to accept, consider the COVID situation. Millions of people
didn't want any restrictions, but yet they got pushed through and were kept
until the rulers graciously decided to end them, regardless of their
increasingly more obvious ineffectiveness and harm. In Canada, the majority of
but the government only bothered to act in
October
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20250310065015/https://www.cbc.ca/news/po
litics/arrivecan-border-covid-end-1.6595710]
(MozArchive), and the
plebeians' opinions were not a factor anyway - Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos
said Monday's decision is not a sign Canada is out of the pandemic, but said the
government's data showed the importation of new variants was no longer having
an effect on the evolution of the virus in country. The newest polls (arc
hive)
(MozArchive) show that
finally, over half of Ukrainians want to end the war ASAP ([...] with
support for negotiated peace rising to 52%) - even while giving up territory to
Putin - More than half of this group (52%) agrees that Ukraine should be open to
making some territorial concessions as part of a peace deal to end the war; and
this doesn't even include half of the male Ukrainian population that escaped
Zelensky's sacrifice
attempts (archive)
(MozArchive) and
presumably are not eligible for the interviews. Despite the citizens'
convictions, the war is still ongoing. People overwhelmingly want to "Free Lui
gi" (archive)
(MozArchive) (even in
(MozArchive)), but he's
surely not going to get freed; regardless, it will be rulers that decide, not
you. When we strip the current society of all its dresses and layers of makeup,
we are left with this:
In the end, the only thing that the rulers truly care about is that you accept
the Government says so part. Otherwise, you can think whatever you want, because
none of it is going to affect policy. Realizing this makes all political
commentary seem pointless unless it covers this issue (which I have never seen).
Instead of the topics listed earlier, you might as well be debating what is the
most beautiful set of kitchen utensils, because it's going to have just as much
effect on what the rulers do; the arrow of causation skips the plebeians'
opinions. But the media is of course happy to stoke the fire, and put all the
emotionally charged topics into the front pages of their websites or TV
programs. This entire scheme only serves as a way to make the plebeians fight
each other, and ignore the root of their dissatisfaction, disempowerment, and
oppression. Namely the rulers who don't care what you think about any of those
issues (as they will do whatever they want to, anyway), but about keeping and
increasing their power. And they are able to do that because of THE FUCKING
LAW that they completely control and that you cannot affect at all. That's why
they are The Enemy Who Surpasses The Law.
Of course, I'm not saying that the listed issues literally don't matter and that
everyone will happily dance together once the rulers are toppled. I'm saying
that it's the law that's the major fundamental issue that provides the
foundation on which all the others stand. Or stated in another way, we can't fix
any other issues while the legal beast is running the show. Anything can become
or cease to be a law at any point, and there's nothing you can do about it. Yet
every community runs straight to the oppressive legal system with all their
grievances. And gets
happy (archiv
e)
(MozArchive) when - once
per era - it does something that supposedly helps them, even if they could not
have affected the decision; even if the "win" was only partial; and even if
they've received ten times the losses (archive)
(MozArchive) (Today,
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents raided a local
establishment in the City of Newark, detaining undocumented residents as well as
citizens, without producing a warrant. One of the detainees is a U.S. military
veteran who suffered the indignity of having the legitimacy of his military
documentation questioned.) for that single "win". They still have absolute zero
power, but are satisfied with their masters raping them a little more gently
than usual. It's the peak of Stockholm Syndrome, and I want to destroy it.
UPDATE January 26: the perfect example just came in, with the anti-lockdown
(MozArchive) They came
for the illegal immigrants and I said ‘make sure you get all of them!’, just
because...guess what...they were abused for being unvaccinated during the era of
COVID hysteria. Which they blame on a random leftist on Twitter, YouTube,
TikTok, wherever...and not on the rulers. So now, since the leftists hate the
deportations, the anti-lockdowners support them to spite them. Wake up! The same
people did both abuses! But you are having an orgasm just because the plebeian
faction that supported the COVID nonsense, is now on the other side of the legal
pitchfork - This. They are welcome to apply through legal channels. A country
without borders is not a country. O rly? You could have "applied through legal
channels", too, meaning got the vaccine - because that's what was required to
and didn't even mind breaking the law to bypass the restrictions - If I was you
I wouldn't even have been so confident going for a job in the US until I
smuggled my plague rat ass into the country; Come through the southern border.
Seriously. But now, because it's "the outgroup" trying to avoid their own abuse,
"the law" is suddenly a sacred shield. Basically, "our group has suffered from
legal abuse years ago, so now your group must, too". How about no one
suffers? Which is what we could have if the plebeians realized they are
plebeians, united, and toppled the rulers. But no, people just can't resist
attacking their fellow plebeians because they fell for a different piece of
government propaganda than themselves. As long as this is how it goes, we will
never win and we will always be slaves.
Of course, I realize there will always be disagreements between people. Not
everyone wants the same life, after all. But right now, a pack of psychopaths is
sitting on top of the mountain pulling the strings, and preventing any of
us from having the life we want to. Ideally, everyone would be able to affect
how his community works, or if he is truly unwanted there, switch to another
community that's closer to his preferences. We have the internet now, and there
could be a website with a list of communities that anyone could freely move to.
You want the zero-COVID or the ignore COVID; the mixed race or the white
ethno-state; the "merit"-based regulation-free capitalism or the commune - it's
up to you. Of course, this wouldn't fix all problems, because a kid is born
somewhere, and cannot choose where it is born. And of course, things such as air
or ground pollution affect everyone in the end. Hey, some problems might simply
not be fixable through the currently existing knowledge and ideas. But many
(most? or dare I say all?) are also - I feel - simply created by the rulers
themselves; for example, who would want to go to war without their war
propaganda? Would people even fight over COVID if the rulers didn't blow it
out of proportion (of
course, they've also created
it; but let's for the
purpose of the argument assume it was natural) and didn't censor information
about alternative
treatments? Regardless of
what you believe, how can we even begin to change anything, if a pack of
psychopaths is currently deciding everything? Of course, their power structure
must be demolished first.
If you believe only one thing you've read from my site, please let it be this.
The fate of the world - or the kind of life your kids, grandkids, will be
leading - is riding on this. And I'm pointing this out because no one else
appears to have figured it out. Except maybe, partially, Andrew Anglin (the
Daily Stormer guy), who for some reason appears to be dismissed by many or most
people, and censored by tech companies
(MozArchive) including
even Cloudflare - as one of its few victims (why do you think so?). He is the
only one (that I know of) that has called out the entire current system as ill
egitimate (archive)
(MozArchive). Though, he
seems to spend too much effort attacking groups of plebeians that he doesn't
like. Still, he comes the closest to my ideas out of anyone I've encountered
(eg: But you do not have to validate the system. You don’t have to go around
talking about politics as if they have any meaningful effect on the behavior of
the government. You certainly don’t have to vote. They can kill you, but they
can’t make you believe they have the right to do so.), so I think his article
that I've linked is very worth reading, regardless.
Anyway, I hope this is the section that unites all plebeians (that's you and me)
against the pack of psychos running the show. I will probably fail in my task,
but at least I'll be able to say that I've tried. And I can't not try, because I
must be able to live with myself. And there is no one else aiming his crosshair
straight at "the law" as a concept, so the regret would bury me if I didn't.
Summary
Laws are designed to keep us in chains. What is currently considered democracy
is an illusion. Certain people are allowed to cause untold destruction without
consequences while the not-so-lucky ones (that's you and me) suffer for
violating the whims of the higher caste. Elections (if real) do not give us any
power and in fact are a distraction. The most important thing for people to do,
then, would be to topple the current law-based political system. The reason
that the legal system is the target is because it alone serves as the final
justification for all the bullshit. E.g you do the crime, you do the time.
Whatever you think does not matter, as long as the mighty legal system
disagrees. No question, those are the rules! Nothing else has this kind of power
over minds. And when we realize this, we know that we have to get rid of the
legal system. UPDATE January 2023: if you want an
example:
I lost my business because I fed an unvaccinated man a pizza. That’s it.
That’s literally it. What pisses me of more is that none of my friends in
the restaurant business said or did anything to help me. You watched a
brother burn in the street because I fed a man a pizza.
And then look at all the cucked comments justifying it:
"I lost my business because I chose not to refrigerate poultry". You don't
have to like the rules, protest them, talk to public officials about them
etc. You lost your business because you chose to break rules. If you behave
like a child you'll be treated like one.
That’s on you bud. Rules apply to everyone no free passes given here.
Nah, homie. You lost your business because you refused to follow the same
rules that were being applied to everyone else. Wanna take a stand? Cool.
That has consequences. Call it what it is.
So you never lost your business because you fed someone pizza- it was
because you failed to follow a government requirement during a pandemic
because you didn’t want to follow it.
Then you got what you deserved. You did business with an unvaccinated person
and endangered lives. You have only yourself to blame
As you can see, many (maybe most) people will comply with anything just because
it's the rules. And yet, absolutely anything can become a law in a flash -
regardless of how pointless and abusive - as the COVID
situation showed. We keep
losing because of blindly following (and for some - worshipping) the law.
Accepting to be shoved around as long as the shover has labeled himself as an
"official" is the biggest "security vuln" of our current society, and we can
patch it by treating the "officials" in the same way as we would treat complete
strangers. If a stranger got in your face and tried to prevent you from leaving
the house, you'd mock him or just ignore. If he sent you a letter trying to get
you to go to a drafting place, you'd just trash it. Yet somehow, if it's an
"official" (policeman or military recruiter) then suddenly those types of
tactics become valid? Bullshit. But that's what our entire system exists to
convince us of. The obedience training in
schools, the fearmongering
mainstream (or even some of the alt) media, the advertisements (for wars, etc),
the confident speeches of the politicians, are all doing everything in their
power to fuel the belief that the "officials" are some special type of people.
But beyond the facade of the label is just another creature hiding a skeleton, a
spleen, and a web of neurons (at least until the AI rules over us directly).
Since the "officials" are the same as us in the end, the same strategies will
work on them, too. Now think about what makes you tick. It is emotions, of which
the strongest one is fear. We all have in our brains the programming that
allows us to flee from a bear in the wild. The rulers (and their minions / Kapos
in the Nazi analogy) are still human, and they have that programming, as well.
The problem here is, that they (especially the decision makers in politicians)
have got too comfortable in their shiny high positions. They probably haven't
felt true fear in a long time. And because they haven't, they don't feel any
inhibitions while executing their heavily violating actions. Once we drop the
belief that they are somehow special, all we have to do is use our extreme
numbers advantage
[(archive)ttps://web.archive.org/web/20241114203105/https://landgeist.com/2022
/12/14/police-officers-in-europe/]
(MozArchive) against
them:
The ratio is even more in our favor in USA, China, or India. Of course, the
police are not all in the same place at the same time, so targeted resistance
would work even better than the raw amounts suggest. Some are unarmed or only
concerned about tackling illegal fishing spots (archive)
(MozArchive) and similar
stuff that's irrelevant in regards to the revolution. And of course, many might
even join us against the actual decision makers, if things get bad enough and
they feel that "winning" is viable. This would be ideal, as then the ratios
would become extremely in our favor.
Either way, the police was unable to prevent what happened in Kazakhstan (archive)
(MozArchive). If that
became a regular occurrence worldwide, the fear programming inside the rulers'
brains would finally get activated. Then, they would think long and hard before
running a pandemic scam or any of the other thousands of violations (December
2024 edit: heh. Couldn't have materialized better than in the Thompson
situation). When the
world rulers finally get robbed of their influence, we can try to setup
in our local areas - or some other system that actually gives the average person
a say.
How to have a revolution
Feel free to send this to anyone interested, but still confused in navigating
the politics or "conspiracy" space.
First, realize that absolutely everything is fucked and there remains
nothing to save, nothing to protect. The "official and accepted" has
completely failed. If you're still in doubt, consider the schooling
system brainwashing our kids,
the COVID response normalizing
slavery, the money system and profit
motive making the
entire "civilized" existence into a brutal fight for survival and status, with
all "higher values" completely absorbed by it. Then the mockery of a legal
system that
supposedly justifies everything, and the spying
structure
watching us 24 / 7 and making sure we don't revolt. It's only after we've lost
everything that we are free to do anything. So, you need to realize that
you already have!
If you have accepted this, realize that the entire situation was dreamed up
and is being kept up by a pack of psychopaths at the top of the pyramid. Or
a few packs, I don't know the ruling structure exactly. It doesn't actually
matter for our purposes, even if it turns out to be reptilians. Either way...
...They have to be removed from power. By any means possible, even "illegal"
ones (if you still believe in the legal system, you need to go back to step
sabotage whatever you
can, even raid the government buildings, if that's what it takes. The rulers
have no moral blocks (proven by COVID, bombing innocent people, etc...), and
we don't need ones, either.
Many of us will lose everything, some might also die. But long term, if
nothing is done, an incomparably worse hell awaits. You have to be prepared to
sacrifice, and drop your comfortable current life (assuming you even have one
right now). This might be the hardest step. Because everything that exists
tries to convince us that the current bullshit simply has to be this way, that
we're powerless to stop it. Even "aware" people just hope to ride the wave,
and "survive somehow". That's our most base instinct, and it has to be
overriden. Again, It's only after we've lost everything that we are free to do
anything. So, the instinct can be overriden by realizing that - if you have
not lost everything yet - you will soon. It can be overriden by
analysis, being honest with yourself while looking into the bleak future. And
maybe by having a big enough support structure that a revolution suddenly
seems viable without huge risks. You have to feel being stronger than the
rulers, that you have a huge numbers advantage. This - then - comes back to
the education part, and after that - coordination (which we can use the
Internet for, while it is still relatively unrestricted). Keep in mind we
don't have a lot of time; the technological slavery system keeps gaining more
ground. For now, the rulers are still very scared (see the Thompson
situation); when they
have AI murderbots walking / flying all over the streets, detecting and
killing revolutionaries, they might not be. So the time to act is now!
What comes after the revolution is finished? I don't know. We'll figure it out
once the plague is controlled. If you want some ideas, I've listed some in
the democracy
section and the toppling the
law section. These
are not necessarily the best or even good ideas. But it's important to not
freeze yourself into the mindset of "oh, but what will we do after? Surely, an
even worse dictator will come around!". But no, nothing is worse than the
plague continuing unresisted. So resist it.
Legalism is antihuman
To resist the "law based order" would be called "chaos" by some (or many, or
most). And yet I cannot imagine a worse "chaos" that a corporation simply being
able to throw ads
around with
impunity. For it to be able to surveil
visitors on
"its property" or even around "its property". For it to be able to appropriate all
kinds of resources -
including ones essential to life - and lock them behind
paywalls of
(MozArchive), or
other requirements such as taking their poisonous vaccine (archive)
(MozArchive). And for them
to be completely immune to consequences - since we've already established that
fines are both way too small and way too
rare to bother them at
all. And that they are not a true punishment either way (in the current system,
that might consist of getting dragged to courts, prison, etc. for specific
people - which doesn't happen today because of the legal concept called
corporate personhood). But the problem is not even limited to corporations. We
now live in a world in which someone like a doctor or nurse can pretty much do
whatever they want, as long as it is "official" and will never be punished
regardless of the harm they
cause. The current
"order" that conservatives so love and everyone else tolerates is simply a giant
gaslighting campaign!
Now consider what is required to keep such an "order" going. To figure it out,
first take a look at how kids act before the process of turning them into
"adults" (a positive sounding term hiding frozen people, learned helplessness
sufferers, or mental slaves) reaches a too advanced stage. They are able to
coordinate a play in a way that is just and satisfying to everyone involved, and
if someone gets out of control, the other kids won't want to play with him
anymore. If someone gets too out of control (eg. by taking away all the toys
of the others) he might even be more directly punished by his peers. This
somehow works; maybe not perfectly because humans are humans and contain
infinite possibilities of expression - but a lot better than the adult legal
system we all know and hopefully hate. One giant advantage of child-like
organization is that it is able to react to all possible behaviors - even
ones no one has ever thought of before - instead of only those written in some
constitution, contract, etc. And we know without a doubt that it can work,
because hunter-gatherers have been managing themselves this way (archive)
(MozArchive) for a very
long time.
So how does this setup eventually disappear? Simply, the kids are thrown early
on into a very unnatural, inhuman, and cruel institution called school which
insanity of this, just consider how many years of constant brainwashing it takes
to perform the transformation - and even then, some manage to avoid it despite
the extreme enemy efforts. But clearly the scheme has worked very well overall,
so much that whenever the modern "adult" detects injustice, the only option that
appears in his mind (if any does at all) is that of suing (only if the
violation is very very serious), or maybe a "legal
protest". Then when it
occurs to him that these are heavily inadequate, he just goes back to taking the
abuse. The first step of recovery - then - must surely be the retrieval of our
children from schools, then the elimination of the latter. After that, we start
slowly recovering our instincts (hey, maybe the now unbrainwashed kids can teach
their own parents...).
Finally - after reclaiming our humanity - the process of recognizing and
punishing violators (regardless of what their "position" is) can begin. Let them
remember the days of their childhood where antisocial behavior would actually
incur resistance from their group - something they've completely forgotten as
"adults". They will be shocked that someone dared to break the "law based order"
that they've come to rely on - then the shock will spread to their peers once
they realize the "law based order" has just become a relic of the cruel and
unjust past, and cannot protect them anymore. Now, they will actually have to
care about the effects they are causing by their actions - just like the kid
grabbing all toys for itself. Then they either adapt, or get eliminated from the
"tribe" - exactly how the hunter-gatherers used to do (According to Boehm,
hunter-gatherers are continuously vigilant to transgressions against the
egalitarian ethos. Someone who boasts, or fails to share, or in any way seems to
think that he (or she, but usually it's a he) is better than others is put in
his place through teasing, which stops once the person stops the offensive
behavior. If teasing doesn't work, the next step is shunning. The band acts as
if the offending person doesn't exist. That almost always works. Imagine what it
is like to be completely ignored by the very people on whom your life depends.
No human being can live for long alone. The person either comes around, or he
moves away and joins another band, where he'd better shape up or the same thing
will happen again). In civilization this could include many additional
strategies such as not selling them stuff from a store, not inviting them to
weddings, etc. Of course, this might not be that easy in practice - after all,
the psychopaths who positioned themselves at the top have had enough time to
cook up many systems to protect the current "order" - such as the
mainstream media, prisons, etc. But it has to be done.