Learning European Languages (Michel Thomas)
[![{map[alt:From Gottfried Hensel's 1791 Synopsis Universae Philologiae
class:titleimg link:/pix/hensel1741.jpg mouse:A language map from Hensel's 1741
Synopsis Universae Philologiae. src:/pix/hensel1741-small.jpg] /home/luke/work/c
ode/lukesmith.info/content/articles/learning-european-languages-michel-thomas.md
<nil> img true 0 {{} {{} 0} {{} {0 0}}} {{} {{} 0} {{} {0 0}}} 135 { 0 0
0} <nil>}](https://lukesmith.xyz/pix/hensel1741-small.jpg "A language map
from Hensel's 1741 Synopsis Universae
P…](https://lukesmith.xyz/pix/hensel1741.jpg)
I've said on a couple livestreams that the ideal way for an English speaker to
begin learning or excel in learning other major European languages (Spanish,
French, Italian and German) is to use Michel Thomas's audiotapes. They can
be found for free on Pirate Bay and other sites, but you can also buy them on
his official site.
This style of audiotapes is so far above any other, it's hard to even put it in
words. They make really exceptional promises: "learn a language in 8 hours" and
in some sense I'm inclined to agree.
They certainly give a reflexive foundation that makes learning anything else
about a language very easy. There are multiple courses and they're worth
listening to multiple times until it's a totally internalized.
Explanation of the Method
The tapes all have Thomas locked in a room with two people who don't know the
language, one male, one female. Thomas simply teaches and illicit basic
responses from the two students, teaching them as they go. As the listener, your
part is to say the proper responses to yourself before the example students. At
all points in time, the students are creating novel sentences, combining basic
concepts.
Lack of vocabulary
Probably the most important part of the tapes is the lack of vocabulary
taught. You don't get 20 irrelevant nouns with each lesson to memorize that you
don't even now how to use. What new words you "learn" are mostly shared in
common with English. The goal is to make you fluent before you have to memorize
words.
Thomas, instead, actually teaches the language and how to be constructive in
it: the verbs, the verb inflections, how to combine them, basic pronouns and
the like. Only once the students understand them does he move on to the words
for real-world objects. Thomas will sometimes explain why he does this in the
course, but it amounts to what I've said in other
places: you can guess or figure out nouns or talk
around them, but if you don't know how to put verbs together, you just don't
know the language and you can't even fake it. It is much easier to learn nouns
after you actually learn the structure of the language and can actually use
them.
Lack of "comprehension"
You're never told to "listen to this passage and think about what it means" in
the Thomas method. The Thomas method is entirely productive:you make the
sentences and you have to put yourself in the mindset of how the language
works.
A lot of other audiotapes, say Pimsleur, have you sit and listen to text and
implicitly ask you to "translate" it. This in essense, keeps you thinking in
English, or thinking in translating mode. The also keep you chained to canned
responses in a single dialog. When people do this, they ignore the actual
structure/grammar of the language, listen for big noticable nouns, and then
piece together what the sentence means. This is always a bad idea.
Michel Thomas actually just knows what he's doing.
It's honestly rare that you even ever see a "good teacher." By that I mean
someone who can easily keep track of what his students know and can devise
questions perfect to pry their knowledge. Thomas is just honestly good at this
and it goes a long way. In the tapes, if he notices that a student repeatedly
messing something up, he knows how to elicit better responses and remind them of
what they need. This is 99% of teaching, despite the fact that it's a really
rare skill.
Don't bother getting the tapes without Michel Thomas
After Michel Thomas's death (or perhaps a little before) the company running his
website above put out tapes for many other languages: Chinese, Arabic, Hindi,
Japanese, etc. under his name. They are done "in his method" theoretically, but
they are no good. They do weird things like have two different teachers: one who
instructs the students and one who is a native speaker of the language to say
the sentences in it. I think the idea behind it was to make sure you hear a
"perfect" accent, but it's a total waste and the sponteneity required for actual
teaching is lost because you have these two different people trying organize
among themselves. I think the teachers lack the introspective skill to keep tabs
on the students' learning that I mentioned above, so all-in-all, I think
they're awkward and fake.
Donovan Nagel (you may know him from his YouTube channel on
BSD) gave Michel
Thomas a negative review
after using the "Michel Thomas" Arabic tapes. I listened to part of the Chinese
tapes and they were not worth it (if you want to learn Chinese I've written
about what I recommend).
But the real Michel Thomas tapes: Spanish, French, Italian, German, done by
the man himself, are the best for all their respective languages.