Between our last pass (28 May) and today we swept the canon (multilateral

bodies plus a deliberately diverse, multi-regional independent press set) for

material developments and re-scored what moved. Forty sub-factors changed across

23 countries. State self-reports were excluded from scoring as usual; Iran's

claim that it will "completely" block the Strait of Hormuz is sourced to state

media (Tasnim) and is treated as a statement of regime intent, not a verified

fact. One theme dominates the week, and one cuts the other way.

The US-Iran ceasefire track collapsed: a tentative 60-day framework stalled

around 31 May, strikes resumed (US hits in Hormozgan and on two ships in the

strait), Iran halted intermediary talks on 1 June, and by 3 June Israel and the

US were signaling readiness for a "full scale" return to military action. The

strait stayed largely shut.

That single event propagates two ways, which is the point of scoring impact

rather than headlines:

• Gulf exporters take the direct hit. A closed strait blocks the dominant

export route, and the countries with no bypass move most. On the near-term

currency decision: Qatar 0.76 -> 0.45, UAE 0.14 -> -0.07, Saudi

Arabia -1.13 -> -1.33, with Kuwait, Iraq and Iran already deep and edging

lower. Long-horizon scores fell less, because a strait closure is the kind of

shock that must eventually resolve.

• Energy importers inherit the inflation. The same barrels not moving show

up as cost-push inflation half a world away. South Korea printed 3.1% in May

(a 26-month high); Japan's central bank lifted its core-inflation outlook to

~2.8%; Germany, India and China all absorbed a near-term inflation markdown.

Their currency scores slipped a few tenths each (Japan 3.36 -> 3.21,

Germany 3.31 -> 3.23, South Korea 2.61 -> 2.48), with China relatively

cushioned by a coal-heavy mix and domestic crude.

This is the framework's asymmetry-of-horizon discipline at work: the shock is

near-term severe and long-term recoverable, so it bites the currency and assets

reads harder than the living one.

On 3 June, Hungary dropped its roughly two-year veto on Ukraine's EU accession,

following Orban's defeat in the March 2026 election; the "fundamentals" cluster

is set to open mid-June. That is a concrete action, not a stated intention, so it

moves the score: Ukraine's living decision rose -0.19 -> -0.02 and assets

-1.40 -> -1.22, with rule-of-law conditionality credited as a long-run

institutional anchor. It reinforces the positive-skew reading we already carried

on Ukraine, a country whose distribution leans up on resolution and reform.

• United States drifts a little further down (living -5.29 -> -5.31) as it

weaponized the USMCA review against Mexico and an above-target PCE print

(3.8%) confirmed the inflation read on partially-entangled official data.

• Mexico is a genuine mixed case: US coercion over the trade review pulls one

way, while a real ~49% fall in daily homicides pulls the other, though the

decline partly reflects a shift to disappearances and extortion, so we credited

it only partially.

• Bolivia is the new acute-deterioration story: cabinet resignations and ~100

nationwide blockades over fuel subsidies took its living score -3.29 -> -3.44.

• Russia edged down on Ukrainian deep strikes against refineries and a

cross-country pipeline pump; Lebanon edged up on a fragile US-brokered

truce; Argentina improved on a seven-year reserves high and a fresh IMF

tranche even as its inflation forecast worsened; Guyana absorbed renewed

cross-border fire from Venezuela.

Floored cases did not move: Sudan, Haiti and others already sit at the bottom of

the scale, so this week's grim news raised our confidence in those reads rather

than the scores themselves.

Every changed sub-factor carries its sources in the country file's notes, and the

aggregates were recomputed mechanically by the shared scoring engine, so the

numbers here cannot drift from what the site serves. A handful of late-May items

that the prior pass had not captured (Argentina's IMF review, the BOJ outlook)

were folded in and flagged as such. As always: this is an analytical framework,

not financial, investment, immigration, or legal advice.