The C Programming Language, Ansi C
Appendix C - Summary of Changes
Appendix C - Summary of Changes
Since the publication of the first edition of this book, the definition of the
C language has undergone changes. Almost all were extensions of the original
language, and were carefully designed to remain compatible with existing
practice; some repaired ambiguities in the original description; and some
represent modifications that change existing practice. Many of the new
facilities were announced in the documents accompanying compilers available
from AT&T, and have subsequently been adopted by other suppliers of C
compilers. More recently, the ANSI committee standardizing the language
incorporated most of the changes, and also introduced other significant
modifications. Their report was in part participated by some commercial
compilers even before issuance of the formal C standard.
This Appendix summarizes the differences between the language defined by the first edition of this book, and that expected to be defined by the final standard. It treats only the language itself, not its environment and library; although these are an important part of the standard, there is little to compare with, because the first edition did not attempt to prescribe an environment or library.
Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Preprocessing is more carefully defined in the Standard than in the first edition, and is extended: it is explicitly token based; there are new operators for concatenation of tokens (##), and creation of strings (#); there are new control lines like #elif and #pragma; redeclaration of macros by the same token sequence is explicitly permitted; parameters inside strings are no longer replaced. Splicing of lines by \ is permitted everywhere, not just in strings and macro definitions. See `_`[Par.A.12`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_.
The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.) The minimum significance of all internal identifiers increased to 31 characters; the smallest mandated significance of identifiers with external linkage remains 6 monocase letters. (Many implementations provide more.)
Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??. Trigraph sequences introduced by ?? allow representation of characters lacking in some character sets. Escapes for #\^[]{}|~ are defined, see `_`[Par.A.12.1`:/page/books/the-c-programming-language/p195.mu]`_. Observe that the introduction of trigraphs may change the meaning of strings containing the sequence ??.